2018
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions among trees: A key element in the stabilising effect of species diversity on forest growth

Abstract: There is mounting evidence that species diversity increases the temporal stability of forest growth. This stabilising effect of diversity has mainly been attributed to species differences in their response to fluctuating environmental conditions. Interactions among individuals could also contribute to the stabilising effect of diversity by increasing the mean and reducing the variance of tree growth, however, this has never been directly demonstrated. We used tree‐ring width chronologies from temperate and bor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies often conclude that the weak or negative associations between climatic change and tree growth are attributable to warming‐induced water deficits (Chen & Luo, ; Chen, Luo, Reich, Searle, & Biswas, ; Girardin et al, ; Restaino et al, ) or reaching the maximum capacity of carbon assimilation of a tree (Hararuk et al, ) or changes in carbon allocation strategies (Giguere‐Croteau et al, ). Interspecific interactions, which we did not quantify in our study, can also determine boreal tree growth responses to climate change (Aussenac, Bergeron, Gravel, & Drobyshev, ; Aussenac et al, ). In our study area, water availability increased during the study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Previous studies often conclude that the weak or negative associations between climatic change and tree growth are attributable to warming‐induced water deficits (Chen & Luo, ; Chen, Luo, Reich, Searle, & Biswas, ; Girardin et al, ; Restaino et al, ) or reaching the maximum capacity of carbon assimilation of a tree (Hararuk et al, ) or changes in carbon allocation strategies (Giguere‐Croteau et al, ). Interspecific interactions, which we did not quantify in our study, can also determine boreal tree growth responses to climate change (Aussenac, Bergeron, Gravel, & Drobyshev, ; Aussenac et al, ). In our study area, water availability increased during the study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In grassland ecosystems, there is abundant evidence that interannual fluctuations of community‐level productivity are smaller in more diverse compared to less diverse communities, resulting in a net positive DSR (Hautier et al, ; Isbell et al, ). The few studies that have analysed temporal stability in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems support the hypothesis that diversity can stabilize community‐level productivity (Aussenac, Bergeron, Gravel, & Drobyshev, ; del Río et al, ; Jucker, Bouriaud, Avacaritei, & Coomes, ; Morin, Fahse, de Mazancourt, Scherer‐Lorenzen, & Bugmann, ). For seasonally dry tropics undergoing supraseasonal drought cycles, where the contrast between favourable and unfavourable growth conditions is likely stronger, there has been some evidence from the Sardinilla experiment that species mixing decreases the climatic sensitivity of tree growth and hence stabilizes productivity (Hutchison et al, ) but no detailed analysis of the underlying drivers of this phenomenon exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Consequently, BPRs at the local neighbourhood scale should become stronger during periods of water deficits, meaning that the relative importance of biodiversity effects increases during drought (Figure a,b). The few evidence on climate–growth relationships in response to local neighbourhood conditions comes from observational studies performed in less diverse temperate forests with a limited taxonomic tree diversity (Jourdan, Kunstler, & Morin, ), and most of these studies accounted for neighbourhood diversity using a contrast of neighbourhood composition (conspecific vs. heterospecific neighbours; Mölder & Leuschner, ; Vitali, Forrester, & Bauhus, ) or neighbourhood competition (intraspecific vs. interspecific competition; Aussenac, Bergeron, Gravel, & Drobyshev, ). Similarly, one recent experimental study explored drought resistance of tropical tree seedlings in response to neighbourhood composition (conspecific vs. heterospecific neighbours; O’Brien, Reynolds, Ong, & Hector, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%