2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions among the medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and midline thalamus in emotional and cognitive processing in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

26
546
3
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 698 publications
(584 citation statements)
references
References 287 publications
26
546
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Inactivation of the mPFC during ES completely blocked the effects of ES on later fear conditioning, so that neither fear to the tone or to the context was reduced by ES. These data are consistent with those reported by Amat et al (2005;2006) and suggest that control over a stressor is protective because it engages the mPFC. The argument here would be that experiencing control during ES activates the mPFC and alters it in such a way that the occurrence of fear later now activates mPFC output to the amygdala to a greater extent than it otherwise would, thereby inhibiting fear responses controlled by the amygdala.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inactivation of the mPFC during ES completely blocked the effects of ES on later fear conditioning, so that neither fear to the tone or to the context was reduced by ES. These data are consistent with those reported by Amat et al (2005;2006) and suggest that control over a stressor is protective because it engages the mPFC. The argument here would be that experiencing control during ES activates the mPFC and alters it in such a way that the occurrence of fear later now activates mPFC output to the amygdala to a greater extent than it otherwise would, thereby inhibiting fear responses controlled by the amygdala.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Both infralimbic (IL) and prelimbic (PL) regions of the mPFC project to the amygdala (Vertes, 2006). Although the literature regarding mPFC regulation of the amygdala and fear is seemingly inconsistent (see Discussion), stimulation within the mPFC has been reported to inhibit CeA function (Berretta et al, 2005) and to both interfere with the acquisition (Rosenkranz et al, 2003) and expression of conditioned fear responses (Milad et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the present work found a role for BLA projections to the VH only in footshock learning, as Malin and McGaugh observed for the anterior cingulate, there is no direct projection from the VH to the anterior cingulate or vice versa. Of note, however, is the consistent co-activation of the anterior cingulate and VH in fear memories including expression/retrieval (Cullen et al 2015), a relationship likely mediated through the nucleus reuniens of thalamus (Vertes 2006;Nieuwenhuis and Takashima 2011). Nonetheless, a wealth of findings provide evidence supporting a promiscuous influence for the BLA on memory consolidation and more discrete roles for other brain regions depending on the component or type of learning involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have also suggested its crucial role in working memory [9,10] . The mPFC in rat consists of four main subdivisions, the medial agranular, anterior cingulate (AC), prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic cortices [10][11][12] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have also suggested its crucial role in working memory [9,10] . The mPFC in rat consists of four main subdivisions, the medial agranular, anterior cingulate (AC), prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic cortices [10][11][12] . inactivation of the ventral mPFC (PL and AC cortices), produces marked deficits in delayedresponse tasks involving short or long delays [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%