Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: a presentation of initiative-response analysis

Linell, Per; Gustavsson, Lennart; Juvonen, Päivi

doi:10.1515/ling.1988.26.3.415

Cited by 144 publications

(158 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

147

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Attunement refers to the reciprocity of staff and clients' verbal and nonverbal behaviour during their routine meetings. To achieve a shared dialogue at the content level, staff and people with an ID must reach a mutual understanding and common ground about what is said (Linell, Gustavsson, & Juvonen, 1988). used the initiative-response analysis of Linell et al (1988) to determine the level of dominance of staff and clients during their regular meetings and the different turn types they used.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To achieve a shared dialogue at the content level, staff and people with an ID must reach a mutual understanding and common ground about what is said (Linell, Gustavsson, & Juvonen, 1988). used the initiative-response analysis of Linell et al (1988) to determine the level of dominance of staff and clients during their regular meetings and the different turn types they used. This type of analysis determines whether interactions are balanced in terms of power distribution and the strategies people use to influence the interaction.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Perceptions and expectations of regular support meetings between staff and people with an intellectual disability

Reuzel

Bosman

Embregts

et al. 2016

Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Client-centred models of care emphasise the importance of collaborative working between staff and clients with an intellectual disability (ID). How people with an ID perceive the nature of their engagement with staff is relatively unknown. This study investigated the perceptions of staff and people with an ID about the goals for their meetings and what aspects of the meetings they viewed as important. Method Interviews were carried out with 9 client-staff dyads. Prior to their meeting, staff and clients were asked about their expectations. Afterwards, both parties were asked about what they believed happened during the interaction. The participants' answers were subjected to a thematic analysis. Results People with an ID appreciated the opportunity to tell their story and valued reliable, practical support and advice. A trusting relationship was important to both clients and staff. Only staff viewed promoting clients' autonomy as important. Conclusion Staff and people with an ID appear to differ in their expectations and perceptions regarding regular support meetings.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptions and expectations of regular support meetings between staff and people with an intellectual disability

Reuzel

Bosman

Embregts

et al. 2016

Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As his ideas have moved into social science, and informed empirical research, there has been increasing demand to clarify the way in which his ideas inform research for both transparency and training purposes. There have been several attempts to formalize a method, such as coding frames for analyzing dominance (Linell, Gustavsson & Juvonen 1988), direct and indirect quotations (Gillespie & Cornish, 2010a) and mapping out positions, especially within the dialogical self tradition (Hermans, 2001b;Raggatt, 2002;Cunha, Salgado & Goncalves, 2011). Are such attempts at formalization consistent with the basic assumptions of dialogism?…”

Section: Dialogism and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Meaning is always for someone, it could be for a participant within the situation, or for an outsider, such as a researcher, interpreting the situation. An utterance is defined as any communicative act (spoken, written or gestured) which is both a response and an initiation (Linell, Gustavsson, & Juvonen, 1988). Utterances are deeply dialogical because they are responsive and contestable, but also because they are both embodied and socially situated, both unique and comprised of generic gestures (Haye & Larraín, 2011).…”

Section: Dialogism and Meaningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sensitizing Questions: A Method to Facilitate Analyzing the Meaning of an Utterance

Gillespie

Cornish

2014

Integr. psych. behav.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We also investigate what it means to have a "distributed" location, that is, to operate in a shared but distributed workspace. Initiative-Response Analysis [26] helped us study the interaction between the team members.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Conventions and Issues of Space for Distributed Collaboration

Sundholm

2007

Intercultural Collaboration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. We followed the work of an international research network that holds regular meetings in technology-enhanced environments. The team is geographically distributed and to support its collaborative work it uses a set of technical artifacts, including audio-and videoconferencing systems and a media space. We have been studying some of the techniques and social conventions the team develops for its collaboration, and different aspects of what it mean to be located in a shared but distributed workspace. Our approach has been to analyze the initiatives and responses made by the team members. Over time the group created conventions; e.g. the chair introduces team members participating only by audio and members turn off their microphones when not talking. The latter convention led to the side effect of faster decision making. We also identified two characteristics, implicit excluding and explicit including, in a situation where the majority of the team members were co-located.

show abstract

Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: a presentation of initiative-response analysis

Cited by 144 publications

References 0 publications

Perceptions and expectations of regular support meetings between staff and people with an intellectual disability

Perceptions and expectations of regular support meetings between staff and people with an intellectual disability

Sensitizing Questions: A Method to Facilitate Analyzing the Meaning of an Utterance

Social Conventions and Issues of Space for Distributed Collaboration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About