Ritual, Emotion, Violence 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9780429464157-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction Ritual Threads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key insight is that ‘presence’ is negotiated over the course of an interaction, despite technology hurdles, such as a lags and delays (Licoppe and Morel, 2012, 2014). Similar results are found in the work of DiMaggio et al (2018), where core elements of a successful interaction ritual, such as mutual entrainment and a synchronized and rhythmic flow between parties, can be observed in online interactions (in this case, through a workplace intranet).…”
Section: Defining the Distributed Courtroomsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A key insight is that ‘presence’ is negotiated over the course of an interaction, despite technology hurdles, such as a lags and delays (Licoppe and Morel, 2012, 2014). Similar results are found in the work of DiMaggio et al (2018), where core elements of a successful interaction ritual, such as mutual entrainment and a synchronized and rhythmic flow between parties, can be observed in online interactions (in this case, through a workplace intranet).…”
Section: Defining the Distributed Courtroomsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This study demonstrates the novelty of concept combination, developed from the theoretical proposition made about an optimal cognitive distance. However, novelty can also be created by combining different topics (DiMaggio et al 2018), and it is worth exploring how these two different kinds of novelty relate to each other and to resonance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction rituals, defined as periods of shared emotion and attention usually within a shared physical space and time, are typical of community membership and bonding and can take place in online mediated environments (Törnberg and Törnberg, 2022). Because the online environment lacks the synchrony of space and time, community is built primarily around the exchange of messages around a shared topic and less on physical cues, resulting in different intensity or requiring different responses from members to build community (DiMaggio et al, 2019;Törnberg and Törnberg, 2022). Similarly, there may be a difference between in-person and online experiences that evoke kama muta, where some KAMMUS Two subscales may be more typical of in-person interactions or experiences.…”
Section: Emotional Reaction To Cute Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%