Interaction Process Analysis of Family Decision‐Making

Winter, William D.; Ferreira, António Jorge

doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1967.00155.x

Cited by 38 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(40 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There have been numerous subsequent studies that have employed talking-time measures of prominence (3,10,12,20,25,33,38,46,50). Farina & Dunham (11) used instances of speaking and percentage of total speaking time to measure dominance in families with schizophrenic offspring.…”

Section: Empirical Research On Prominencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Validity is supported in both cases through the occurrence of significant correlations among different measures of the same construct. There have been numerous subsequent studies that have employed talking-time measures of prominence (3,10,12,20,25,33,38,46,50). In so doing, researchers have employed a variety of behavioral measures, task outcome measures, and interaction scales.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Multi‐Method Investigation of Two Family Constructs

et al. 1978

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two family constructs--prominence and interpersonal distance--are examined. Their origins are traced in the experimental and theoretical literature. The validity of each construct is investigated using data obtained from 15 families with a symptom-bearing child. Validity is supported in both cases through the occurrence of significant correlations among different measures of the same construct. It is suggested that the current distress of the families being studied may have increased the clarity of the prominence hierarchies and dyadic distances that emerged.

show abstract

Section: Empirical Research On Prominencementioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Multi‐Method Investigation of Two Family Constructs

et al. 1978

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In general, most of these studies examine the concept of family power structure in terms of who had what power in family decision making (Blood and Wolfe, 1960;Centers et al, 1971;Hallenbeck, 1966;Heer, 1963;Kenkel, 1957;and Winter and Ferricra, 1967). As a result of this concern, investigators have developed a wide array of conceptual and measurement tools for analyzing these power relationships.…”

Section: Exchange Of Conjugal Power In the Control Of Family Food Conmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exchange of Conjugal Power in the Control of Family Food Consumption

Schafer

Bohlen

1977

Home Economics Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this investigation was to examine the process involved in decision making in regard to family food behavior. One hundred and sixteen young married couples were asked to respond to a questionnaire designed to elicit the different types of power used by husbands and wives with regard to family food preferences. The study centered around two dimensions: (1) the type of power used by husbands to control or influence food preferences and (2) the wives' counter to husbands' power usage. The results indicate that the majority of wives perceived they would comply with their husbands' desires regarding family meals. The husbands tended to gain compliance with their wishes through usage of a “referent” or personal power tactic. When wives countered their husbands' responses, the wives typically utilized “coercive” or “legitimate” power.

show abstract

“…Several coding methods can be distinguished besides the coding of ongoing interaction used with the original Bales system. For example, coding can be done from audiotapes (7, 8, 15, 16, 22, 44, 45), from videotapes (1, 2), from typescripts made from tapes (27, 32, 33, 38), or from tapes and type‐script in the “tape‐typescript” method identified and used by Waxler and Mishler (42) and by others (26, 30, 31).…”

Section: Approaches To Specifying Interaction Unitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Scheme for Specifying Interaction Units

Schultz

1975

Family Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The specification of units is an important issue in any family interaction research in which samples of communication are coded. This paper first reviews the methods investigators have used to cope with this problem and then outlines a new Interaction Unitizing Scheme for preparing type‐scripts using the “speech” as the interaction unit. Subsequently, coding can be done directly from these unitized transcripts, or they can be used to define units when coding from audio or videotape. Reliability methods are outlined, and data are presented indicating that the unitizing scheme has high inter‐coder reliability.

show abstract

Interaction Process Analysis of Family Decision‐Making

Cited by 38 publications

References 17 publications

A Multi‐Method Investigation of Two Family Constructs

A Multi‐Method Investigation of Two Family Constructs

Exchange of Conjugal Power in the Control of Family Food Consumption

A Scheme for Specifying Interaction Units

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About