Abstract:The importance of familiarizing children with the Maker Movement, Makerspaces and Maker mindset has been acknowledged. In this literature review, we examine the complex social action of children, aged from 7 to 17 (K-12), engaging in technology Making activities as it is seen in the extant literature. The included papers contain empirical data from actual digital Making workshops and diverse research projects with children, conducted in both formal and non-formal/informal settings, such as schools or museums, … Show more
“…mathematics classrooms (Nemirovsky, Rasmussen, Sweeney, & Wawro, 2012); astronomy (Azevedo & Mann, 2017)), it has not typically foregrounded the history or genesis of the relationships within the focal interaction. In a recent review of literature on children's making, Norouzi, Kinnula, and Iivari (2019) similarly found that histories of participants and the interactions between them are very rarely the focus of existing studies. We have found these interactional histories to be consequential to the ways embodied actions unfold and to the kinds of relations enacted within a setting over time.…”
Studies of embodied cognition offer powerful accounts of the semiotic resources people use as they think together within different domains. Yet this research does not typically foreground the history of relationships within focal interactions-a history we have found to be consequential to the ways embodied actions unfold. Through ethnographic and interactional analysis of the assistance students received in a tinkering afterschool program and the forms of assistance they enacted over time, we show how children supported one another using embodied movements that were embedded in relational histories and imbued with pedagogical and ethical values. We substantiate these findings by introducing the range of embodied movements identified within the setting, followed by a detailed analysis of three cases spanning distinct time-scales (5 minutes, 1 week, 3 years). The cases help establish the construct of embodied pathways, which we define as courses of possible action involving participants' bodies and voices that model particular relations. We argue that the experience of receiving embodied assistance creates
“…mathematics classrooms (Nemirovsky, Rasmussen, Sweeney, & Wawro, 2012); astronomy (Azevedo & Mann, 2017)), it has not typically foregrounded the history or genesis of the relationships within the focal interaction. In a recent review of literature on children's making, Norouzi, Kinnula, and Iivari (2019) similarly found that histories of participants and the interactions between them are very rarely the focus of existing studies. We have found these interactional histories to be consequential to the ways embodied actions unfold and to the kinds of relations enacted within a setting over time.…”
Studies of embodied cognition offer powerful accounts of the semiotic resources people use as they think together within different domains. Yet this research does not typically foreground the history of relationships within focal interactions-a history we have found to be consequential to the ways embodied actions unfold. Through ethnographic and interactional analysis of the assistance students received in a tinkering afterschool program and the forms of assistance they enacted over time, we show how children supported one another using embodied movements that were embedded in relational histories and imbued with pedagogical and ethical values. We substantiate these findings by introducing the range of embodied movements identified within the setting, followed by a detailed analysis of three cases spanning distinct time-scales (5 minutes, 1 week, 3 years). The cases help establish the construct of embodied pathways, which we define as courses of possible action involving participants' bodies and voices that model particular relations. We argue that the experience of receiving embodied assistance creates
“…Schools welcome opportunities to participate in projects organised in partnership with the university within these cross-subject modules as they are a new element in Finnish basic education considering their compulsory status in recent curricula (Finnish National Board of Education 2016). Conducting Making projects within and beyond schools inherently involves collaboration between participants with di erent disciplinary backgrounds (e.g., Norouzi et al 2019). Such projects thus provide fruitful possibilities to study interdisciplinary work from the perspective of the involved researchers or from the viewpoint of collaboration between di erent disciplines.…”
Despite an abundance of research on collaboration between participants with different disciplinary backgrounds, there is less research available on researchers’ reflections on their working process. This study sheds light on the interdisciplinary work of a research group in the context of a Making project involving design and digital fabrication at school. Nexus analysis is used as a research strategy. The research material includes researchers’ reflective writing, a video recording of their group discussion and their participatory observations throughout their longstanding collaboration surrounding the short-term Making project. The findings highlight the diversity and roles of the key social actors, and how their historical bodies and discourses in place related to doing research in academia are relevant for the actual Making project at school. The study provides implications for methodological development, interdisciplinary work and for carrying out projects with participants beyond university.
“…However, studies that combine entrepreneurship education with digital fabrication and making are scarce [35,36], even if both entrepreneurship education and digital fabrication and making have been widely studied separately. Studies on digital fabrication and making tend also to focus on success stories rather than on scrutinizing the challenges involved [25]. We aim to fill these gaps, asking as our research question, What are the challenges involved in combining digital fabrication with entrepreneurship education in the school context?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe they will be of use to the diverse group of researchers and practitioners coming together in Fab Labs and makerspaces, in and out of school environment, to work with children with an interest to encourage children to adopt the Protagonist role. Prior literature has shown the practitioners form a very diverse group concerning their experience and expertise, some lacking experience in pedagogy, others having very limited background in technology and making [23][24][25]28]. Hence, we expect discussion about potential challenges and associated lessons learned to be valuable.…”
Digital fabrication, making and entrepreneurship education all have potential to empower children and increase their abilities to participate and shape the society and digitalization within, and act as active "protagonists" instead of passive consumers. While the potential of these educational trends has been acknowledged, they have mostly been studied separately and without specific focus on challenges involved. We have conducted a business innovation project with teenagers at school, combining elements of digital fabrication, making and entrepreneurship education. Our qualitative, data-driven analysis focused on the process and the challenges involved in the endeavor. As a result, we generate a list of lessons learned associated with teenagers adopting the role of a protagonist, driving business innovation. Our main findings relate to the lessons learned on the importance of balancing the making activities with the entrepreneurial aspects and negotiating the roles and responsibilities between the adult participants.
CCS CONCEPTS• Human-centered computing; • Human computer interaction (HCI); • Empirical studies in HCI;
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.