2018
DOI: 10.1177/0954406217749270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of tip vortex and laminar separation bubble over wings with different aspect ratios under low Reynolds numbers

Abstract: In present study, aerodynamics of a NACA4412 wings with aspect ratio of 1 and 3 was considered experimentally at Reynolds numbers of 2.5 × 104, 5 × 104 and 7.5 × 104. Studies for AR = 1 wing showed that stall was delayed and extra (vortex) lift was obtained, because separation bubble got smaller in both chordwise and spanwise axes with effect of wing-tip vortices. Oil-flow experiments at higher angles of attack clarified the reason for vortex lift obtained from AR = 1 wing. However, there was an increase in dr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implicates that stall occurs at higher angles of attack compared to a two-dimensional airfoil, because new fluid from the pressure side can enter the boundary layer on the suction side and the flow remains attached to the airfoil surface for a longer downstream distance. This phenomenon was also observed by Genç et al (2018), where for a NACA 4412 with AR = 3 the separation of the shear layer was suppressed by the formation of tip vortices, thus causing a delay of stall for angles of attack up to 40 • and Reynolds number 50,000. For higher Reynolds numbers, the finite airfoil acted as a 2D airfoil because the effect of viscous forces and leading edge vortices on the flow decreased.…”
Section: Hot-wire Measurement Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This implicates that stall occurs at higher angles of attack compared to a two-dimensional airfoil, because new fluid from the pressure side can enter the boundary layer on the suction side and the flow remains attached to the airfoil surface for a longer downstream distance. This phenomenon was also observed by Genç et al (2018), where for a NACA 4412 with AR = 3 the separation of the shear layer was suppressed by the formation of tip vortices, thus causing a delay of stall for angles of attack up to 40 • and Reynolds number 50,000. For higher Reynolds numbers, the finite airfoil acted as a 2D airfoil because the effect of viscous forces and leading edge vortices on the flow decreased.…”
Section: Hot-wire Measurement Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Recently, scientists have concentrated upon low Reynolds number aerodynamics as a result of the progression on micro air vehicle (MAV), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) or wind turbines. As is known, at low Re number flow regimes, a laminar separation bubble (LSB) brings about some unfavorable effects such as diminishing lift, enhancing drag, noise and vibration (Zhang et al , 2008; Ricci and Montelpare, 2005; Genç, 2010; Koca et al , 2018; Genç et al , 2018; Demir et al , 2016; Genç et al , 2016a; Demir and Genç, 2017; Karasu et al , 2018). The fluid flow is vulnerable to separate at low Reynolds number flow conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were the experiments and the simulations of the flow of airfoil at low Reynolds number. The condition of the separation bubbles (laminar flow and turbulent flow) generated by the airfoil at low Reynolds number was mainly discussed in Hu and Yang 32 as well as the shedding frequency and trajectory of the vortex in Koca et al 33 and Genc et al 34 The influence of Reynolds number on the stall characteristics of airfoil was also described. 35,36 The performance of a wind turbine is generally determined by the operating conditions 37 of the blade, and improving the flow field around the blade is key to improve its output power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 and Genc et al. 34 The influence of Reynolds number on the stall characteristics of airfoil was also described. 35,36…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%