2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of temperature and photoperiod on male postsmolt maturation of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For males, there were no differences in length between salmon caught in the open Baltic Sea and the ones at the river mouths (one‐way ANOVAs, p > 0.05); for females these differences in length comparing salmon caught in the open Baltic Sea and individuals at the river mouths were significant (one‐way ANOVAs, p < 0.05) except for individuals caught in Umeälven river mouth (one‐way ANOVA, F 1,25 = 0.74, p = 0.399). Although smaller and in some cases significantly, salmon caught in the open Baltic were probably ready to migrate towards their natal rivers given their GSI values (Table 2) higher than GSI threshold for the onset of maturation in Atlantic salmon of 0.06 and 0.3% defined by previous studies (Peterson & Harmon, 2005; Davidson et al, 2016; Martinez, Balseiro, Fleming, et al, 2023; Martinez, Balseiro, Stefansson, et al, 2023). Length of the fish also tended to vary somewhat between sampling occasions in each river but not significantly (one‐way ANOVAs, p > 0.05), except for females in Drammen (one‐way ANOVA, F 2,24 = 6.94, p = 0.004) and Driva rivers (one‐way ANOVA, F 1,15 = 7.41, p = 0.016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…For males, there were no differences in length between salmon caught in the open Baltic Sea and the ones at the river mouths (one‐way ANOVAs, p > 0.05); for females these differences in length comparing salmon caught in the open Baltic Sea and individuals at the river mouths were significant (one‐way ANOVAs, p < 0.05) except for individuals caught in Umeälven river mouth (one‐way ANOVA, F 1,25 = 0.74, p = 0.399). Although smaller and in some cases significantly, salmon caught in the open Baltic were probably ready to migrate towards their natal rivers given their GSI values (Table 2) higher than GSI threshold for the onset of maturation in Atlantic salmon of 0.06 and 0.3% defined by previous studies (Peterson & Harmon, 2005; Davidson et al, 2016; Martinez, Balseiro, Fleming, et al, 2023; Martinez, Balseiro, Stefansson, et al, 2023). Length of the fish also tended to vary somewhat between sampling occasions in each river but not significantly (one‐way ANOVAs, p > 0.05), except for females in Drammen (one‐way ANOVA, F 2,24 = 6.94, p = 0.004) and Driva rivers (one‐way ANOVA, F 1,15 = 7.41, p = 0.016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%