Interaction of Synthetic 10-Tyrosyl Analogues of Secretin with Hormone Receptors on Pancreatic Acinar Cells

Molecular Endocrinology

Hosohata

Pinon

et al. 2006

Understanding of the conformational changes in G protein-coupled receptors associated with activation and inactivation is of great interest. We previously used photoaffinity labeling to elucidate spatial approximations between photolabile residues situated throughout the pharmacophore of secretin agonist probes and this receptor. The aim of the current work was to develop analogous photolabile secretin antagonist probes and to explore their spatial approximations. The most potent secretin antagonist reported is a pseudopeptide ([psi(4, 5)]secretin) in which the peptide bond between residues 4 and 5 was replaced by a psi(CH(2)-NH) peptide bond isostere. We have developed a series of [psi(4, 5)]secretin analogs incorporating photolabile benzoyl phenylalanine residues in positions 6, 22, and 26. Each bound to the secretin receptor saturably and specifically, with affinity similar to their parental peptide. At concentrations with no measurable agonist activity, each probe covalently labeled the secretin receptor. Peptide mapping using proteolytic cleavage, immunoprecipitation, and radiochemical sequencing identified that each of these three probes labeled the amino terminus of the secretin receptor. Whereas the position 22 probe labeled the same residue as its analogous agonist probe and the position 6 probe labeled a residue within two residues of that labeled by its analogous agonist probe, the position 26 probe labeled a site 16 residues away from that labeled by its analogous agonist probe. Thus, whereas structurally related agonist and antagonist probes dock in the same general region of this receptor, conformational differences in active and inactive states result in substantial differences in spatial approximation at the carboxyl-terminal end of secretin analogs.

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Section: Probe Characterizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differential Spatial Approximation between Secretin and Its Receptor Residues in Active and Inactive Conformations Demonstrated by Photoaffinity Labeling

Molecular Endocrinology

Hosohata

Pinon

et al. 2006

“…1 ). Replacement of the leucine naturally present in position 10 with a radioiodinatable tyrosine has previously been demonstrated to be compatible with normal peptide binding and biological activity (13). All peptides were synthesized by manual solidphase techniques using Pal resin and purified by reversed‐phase HPLC, as described previously (14).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping spatial approximations between the amino terminus of secretin and each of the extracellular loops of its receptor using cysteine trapping

Ball

et al. 2012

FASEB j.

While it is evident that the carboxyl-terminal region of natural peptide ligands bind to the amino-terminal domain of class B GPCRs, how their biologically critical amino-terminal regions dock to the receptor is unclear. We utilize cysteine trapping to systematically explore spatial approximations among residues in the first five positions of secretin and in every position within the receptor extracellular loops (ECLs). Only Cys(2) and Cys(5) secretin analogues exhibited full activity and retained moderate binding affinity (IC(50): 92±4 and 83±1 nM, respectively). When these peptides probed 61 human secretin receptor cysteine-replacement mutants, a broad network of receptor residues could form disulfide bonds consistent with a dynamic ligand-receptor interface. Two distinct patterns of disulfide bond formation were observed: Cys(2) predominantly labeled residues in the amino terminus of ECL2 and ECL3 (relative labeling intensity: Ser(340), 94±7%; Pro(341), 84±9%; Phe(258), 73±5%; Trp(274) 62±8%), and Cys(5) labeled those in the carboxyl terminus of ECL2 and ECL3 (Gln(348), 100%; Ile(347), 73±12%; Glu(342), 59±10%; Phe(351), 58±11%). These constraints were utilized in molecular modeling, providing improved understanding of the structure of the transmembrane bundle and interconnecting loops, the orientation between receptor domains, and the molecular basis of ligand docking. Key spatial approximations between peptide and receptor predicted by this model (H(1)-W(274), D(3)-N(268), G(4)-F(258)) were supported by mutagenesis and residue-residue complementation studies.

“…Each probe (except for position 10 Bpa probe) incorporated a tyrosine residue in position 10 to replace the natural leucine residue in that position as a site for radioiodination that has previously been well tolerated [19, 20]. For the probe incorporating a Bpa in position 10, a tyrosine for radioiodination was incorporated in position 26.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Insights into the impact of phenolic residue incorporation at each position along secretin for receptor binding and biological activity

Pinon

Miller

2013

Regulatory Peptides

Understanding of the structural importance of each position along a peptide ligand can provide important insights into the molecular basis for its receptor binding and biological activity. This has typically been evaluated using serial replacement of each natural residue with an alanine. In the current report, we have further complemented alanine scanning data with the serial replacement of each residue within secretin-27, the natural ligand for the prototypic class B G protein-coupled secretin receptor, using a photolabile phenolic residue. This not only provided the opportunity to probe spatial approximations between positions along a docked ligand with its receptor, but also provided structure-activity insights when compared with tolerance for alanine replacement of the same residues. The pattern of sensitivity to phenolic residue replacement was periodic within the carboxyl-terminal region of this peptide ligand, corresponding with alanine replacements in that region. This was supportive of the alpha-helical conformation of the peptide in that region and its docking within a groove in the receptor amino-terminal domain. In contrast, the pattern of sensitivity to phenolic residue replacement was almost continuous in the amino-terminal region of this peptide ligand, again similar to alanine replacements, however, there were key positions in which either the phenolic residue or alanine was differentially preferred. This provided insights into the receptor environment of the portion of this ligand most critical for its biological activity. As the structure of the intact receptor is elucidated, these data will provide a guide for ligand docking to the core domain and to help clarify the molecular basis of receptor activation.