The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1986.tb14591.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of some muscarinic agonists and antagonists at the prejunctional muscarinic receptor in the rabbit ear artery preparation

Abstract: 1 The inhibitory effect of several muscarinic agonists on responses to sympathetic nerve stimulation of the isolated perfused ear artery of the rabbit was compared to that of acetylcholine in preparations pretreated with dyflos, cocaine and yohimbine. 2 In general the potency of the agonists was similar to that observed at peripheral muscarinic sites except for arecaidine propargyl ester and 4-(m-chlorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-2-butynyl trimethylammonium chloride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many respects its activity resembles that of (4-(m-chlorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-2butynyl-trimethyl ammonium chloride) being 20 to 100 times less potent than the latter at ganglionic and peripheral sites (Jones, 1963; Trendelenburg, 1966;Jaramillo & Volle, 1967a,b;Fozard & Muscholl, 1972). However, differences exist between these two agonists in that is inactive at some receptors where McN-A-343 shows relatively high activity (Choo et al, 1986) and AHR-602 functions as an agonist at some sites where McN-A-343 acts as an antagonist (Brown et al, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many respects its activity resembles that of (4-(m-chlorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-2butynyl-trimethyl ammonium chloride) being 20 to 100 times less potent than the latter at ganglionic and peripheral sites (Jones, 1963; Trendelenburg, 1966;Jaramillo & Volle, 1967a,b;Fozard & Muscholl, 1972). However, differences exist between these two agonists in that is inactive at some receptors where McN-A-343 shows relatively high activity (Choo et al, 1986) and AHR-602 functions as an agonist at some sites where McN-A-343 acts as an antagonist (Brown et al, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the rabbit ear artery the sympathetic nerves appear to have at least two types of inhibitory prejunctional muscarine receptors as a number of antagonists indicate different affinities for CCh and McN (Choo et al 1985(Choo et al , 1986Darroch et al 1990). For example pirenzepine was found to be approximately 20-fold more potent and AF-DX 116 three-fold less potent when McN rather than CCh was the agonist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%