2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.08.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of phenol and dopamine with commercial MWCNTs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outstanding mechanical and conductive properties of carbon nanoparticles (CNPs), together with their unique structure and low density, place them among the most common fillers. Carbon nanofiber and carbon nanotubes (CNT) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] 1,2 , N. Miklósi 1 and its derivatives [21][22][23][24], mainly graphene oxide (GO), have attracted marked interest in the last few years. In biomedical applications, however, the uncertainty surrounding the toxicity of CNTs [14] could affect choices of nanocarbon filler.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outstanding mechanical and conductive properties of carbon nanoparticles (CNPs), together with their unique structure and low density, place them among the most common fillers. Carbon nanofiber and carbon nanotubes (CNT) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] 1,2 , N. Miklósi 1 and its derivatives [21][22][23][24], mainly graphene oxide (GO), have attracted marked interest in the last few years. In biomedical applications, however, the uncertainty surrounding the toxicity of CNTs [14] could affect choices of nanocarbon filler.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the titration in the case of CNTs are described elsewhere [22]. The initial (immersion) pH of the potentiometric titration is used to characterize the behaviour of the carbon nanotubes in aqueous solution.…”
Section: Acid-base Properties In Aqueous Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, however, that the surface area available for the molecules in the liquid phase may be different from S BET due to i) the kinetic conditions (77 K vs. 293 K) and ii) the different cross sectional area of the molecules. The accessibility of the inner borehole during the shaking is to be considered as well [22]. Comparison of the surface area related n m values reveals that the surface coverage by phenol is very similar, 19% and…”
Section: Characterisation Of the Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New materials such as multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) also have the potential for effective removal of organic compounds like phenol, chlorophenols, nitroaromatic compounds, etc. (Sheng et al 2010;Shen et al 2009;Arasteh et al 2010;Abdel Salam et al 2010;Ji et al 2010;Liao et al 2008;Tóth et al 2011;Wiśniewski et al 2012;Li et al 2013). However the relatively large surface area and the high sorption capacity of MWCNTs are compromised by their strong hydrophobic character, which results in self assembled aggregates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%