1980
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(80)90159-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of norepinephrine with cerebrocortical activity evoked by stimulation of somatosensory afferent pathways in the rat☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
90
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…but like that of NE (Cedarbaum and Aghajanian, 1978;Waterhouse and Woodward, 1980;Aston Jones, 1985) it appears to involve the modulation of the activity of other transmitters, at least to some degree. Under essentially resting conditions, it may be necessary to challenge the overall system before general functional effects can be demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…but like that of NE (Cedarbaum and Aghajanian, 1978;Waterhouse and Woodward, 1980;Aston Jones, 1985) it appears to involve the modulation of the activity of other transmitters, at least to some degree. Under essentially resting conditions, it may be necessary to challenge the overall system before general functional effects can be demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Analogous data have accrued from studies of somatosensory cortex (Waterhouse & Woodward, 1980) and visual cortex (Kasamatsu & Heggelund, 1982). Thus, the effect ofNA applied to the neocortex extends over at least three sensory modalities and seems to enhance responses to stimuli conveyed to the specific cortical region by direct thalamic sensory projections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This conditioned response, elicited during the reminder period, may include an increase in norepinephrine activity (such a conditioned NE response to environmental cues previously associated with footshock has recently been demonstrated by Cassens, Roffman, Kurac, Orsulak, & Schildkraut, 1980). Several lines of research have suggested that the noradrenergic forebrain projections are intimately involved in the regulation of attentional mechanisms (Robbins & Everitt, 1982;Segal & Bloom, 1976;Waterhouse & Woodward, 1980). Conditioned increase in this activity could result in better attention to intramaze discriminative cues during the subsequent test, thereby resulting in better performance in terms of the errors seen in reminded animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%