Interaction of Atomic Particles With a Solid Surface / Vzaimodeistvie Atomnykh Chastits S Poverkhnost’yu Tverdogo Tela / Взаимо 1969
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-4809-0_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Neutral Atoms with a Solid Surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the sputtering rate and the secondary electron current can be detected only when the beam energy is higher than the threshold voltage of the sputtering and the secondary electron emission, respectively [2,61]. In the secondary electron method, the secondary electron yield depends strongly on the surface composition and morphology of the target.…”
Section: Conventional Methods For Beam Characteristics Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the sputtering rate and the secondary electron current can be detected only when the beam energy is higher than the threshold voltage of the sputtering and the secondary electron emission, respectively [2,61]. In the secondary electron method, the secondary electron yield depends strongly on the surface composition and morphology of the target.…”
Section: Conventional Methods For Beam Characteristics Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be used for the analysis of not only semiconductors and metals but also insulators, composites and inorganic and organic materials. Interactions of neutral atoms with solid surfaces are classified by their beam energy, as shown in figure 1 [2,3].…”
Section: Interaction Of Neutral Atoms With a Solid Surface And Its Ap...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides the results of Hagstrum, Baragiola et al relied on the results of Oechsner [48] and Arifov. [49] The former, however, used Ar + ions with a kinetic energy of 1 keV, which can significantly increase the electron yield compared with relatively slow ions (4-100 eV). Since our model does not consider kinetic mechanisms in the calculation of the yield, this could be an explanation as to why our results lie below Baragiola's fit.…”
Section: (B) (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such treatment of the electron emission problem is not correct because, if the measurements have been performed in a differential manner, the presence of such particles is manifested by some structure in the energy and angular distributions (Soszka and Soszka 1983). The surface adsorbed layer essentially determines the features of the ion-electron emission under 'classical vacuum conditions' (Arifov 1969). Under ultrahigh-vacuum conditions the influence of adsorbed particles can indeed be neglected but the role of impurities deposited by the ion beam is still important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%