2024
DOI: 10.1039/d3cp06003a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of low-energy electrons with radiosensitizers

Barbora Sedmidubská,
Jaroslav Kočišek

Abstract: We provide an experimentalist’s perspective on the present state-of-the-art in the studies of low-energy electron interactions with common radiosensitizers, including compounds used in combined chemo-radiation therapy and their model systems....

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 302 publications
(429 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy in the resonance position is consistent with the typical errors of EOM-CCSD for excitation energies of bound states. 71 We also find milder first-order corrections with CAP-exFCI [the resonance position changes by −0.013 (6) eV and the width changes by −0.09 (2) eV] than with CAP-EOM-EA-CCSD (resonance position changes by 0.084 eV and width by −0.162 eV). This in turn deteriorates the favorable comparison observed for the zeroth-order results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The discrepancy in the resonance position is consistent with the typical errors of EOM-CCSD for excitation energies of bound states. 71 We also find milder first-order corrections with CAP-exFCI [the resonance position changes by −0.013 (6) eV and the width changes by −0.09 (2) eV] than with CAP-EOM-EA-CCSD (resonance position changes by 0.084 eV and width by −0.162 eV). This in turn deteriorates the favorable comparison observed for the zeroth-order results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This in turn deteriorates the favorable comparison observed for the zeroth-order results. The first-order CAP-EOM-EA-CCSD resonance position becomes even more overestimated, by 0.136 (6) eV, whereas the width now appears underestimated by −0.05(1) eV, with respect to first-order CAP-exFCI. The findings for CO − are overall similar to those discussed for N 2 − .…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations