2000
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/33/15/201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of laser radiation with a negative ion in the presence of a strong static electric field

Abstract: Abstract. This paper provides a general theoretical description of a weakly bound atomic system (a negative ion) interacting simultaneously with two (generally strong) fields, a static electric field and a monochromatic laser field having an arbitrary elliptical polarization. The zerorange δ-potential is used to model the interaction of a bound electron in a negative ion as well as the interaction of a detached electron with the residual atom. Our treatment combines the quasistationary (complex energy) and qua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
(427 reference statements)
2
99
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to present our results in the most general form, it is convenient to use scaled units based on the single parameter κ of the model potential (8): the length unit is 1/κ; the energy and the frequency are measured in units of |E 0 | and |E 0 |/h; the field amplitude F is measured in units of the 'internal field', F 0 = 2m|E 0 | 3 /|e|h and the corresponding scaled unit of the intensity, I = cF 2 (9), which is self-consistent for the (one-parameter) δ-potential model. However, it is well known that for real negative ions more exact results may be obtained using, instead of N, a corrected normalization constant, N c , which may be obtained, e.g., by analysing the asymptotic behaviour of the wavefunction for large r (cf [29,128,140] for details). For this case, our results for the photodetachment cross sections, σ (n) , and/or probabilities should be multiplied by the renormalization factor A c = 2π N 2 c /κ.…”
Section: Definitions and Scaled Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to present our results in the most general form, it is convenient to use scaled units based on the single parameter κ of the model potential (8): the length unit is 1/κ; the energy and the frequency are measured in units of |E 0 | and |E 0 |/h; the field amplitude F is measured in units of the 'internal field', F 0 = 2m|E 0 | 3 /|e|h and the corresponding scaled unit of the intensity, I = cF 2 (9), which is self-consistent for the (one-parameter) δ-potential model. However, it is well known that for real negative ions more exact results may be obtained using, instead of N, a corrected normalization constant, N c , which may be obtained, e.g., by analysing the asymptotic behaviour of the wavefunction for large r (cf [29,128,140] for details). For this case, our results for the photodetachment cross sections, σ (n) , and/or probabilities should be multiplied by the renormalization factor A c = 2π N 2 c /κ.…”
Section: Definitions and Scaled Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the two-body contact interaction is discussed in elementary quantum texts [2]. It has, e.g., been used to gain insights into the correlations of molecules, such as H + 2 and H 2 , and to model atom-laser interactions [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study is based on approximations to exact quantum results for the transition amplitudes within the quasienergy approach [8] for the case of a short-range potential [9,10]. Detailed analytical study of strong fi eld processes is possible only for short-range potentials U(r) (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…τ 1 = 4.086): For our purposes, it is necessary to estimate the matrix element M k0 for large k: k > |z 1 | (where |z 1 | 1 for small ω and u p ω). For these parameter values, the Bessel function in (5) may be replaced by its Debye asymptotic limit [15]: (9) Since |J k ( z(τ))| has a global maximum at τ = τ 1 , the dominant contribution of J k ( z(τ)) to the integral in (5) comes from the small interval of τ centred at τ = τ 1 . Substituting in (9) x → z(τ) and expanding z(τ) up to second-order terms near the point τ = τ 1 , we obtain the following approximation for the Bessel function in (5): (10) where Using (10) to evaluate the integral in (5) for k΄ = 0, the resulting approximate value for |M k0 | is (11) where α = k -|z 1 | -ω -1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%