2002
DOI: 10.1124/mol.61.2.407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of KATPChannel Modulators with Sulfonylurea Receptor SUR2B: Implication for Tetramer Formation and Allosteric Coupling of Subunits

Abstract: Sulfonylurea receptors (SURs) are subunits of ATP-sensitive K ϩ channels (K ATP channels); they mediate the channel-closing effect of sulfonylureas such as glibenclamide and the channelactivating effect of K ATP channel openers such as the pinacidil analog P1075. We investigated the inhibition by MgATP and P1075 of glibenclamide binding to SUR2B, the SUR subtype in smooth muscle. To increase specific binding, experiments were also performed using SUR2B(Y1206S), a mutant with higher affinity for glibenclamide t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to data from Schwanstecher et al (23), suggesting complete displacement of [ 3 H]glibenclamide by pinacidil and diazoxide at SUR1, but is in accordance with previous results showing displacement only to ϳ80% (l-pinacidil) and ϳ50% (diazoxide) at SUR1 or the splice variant SUR1⌬17 (20). This suggests the existence of SUR1 complexes in which glibenclamide and openers are bound simultaneously (8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast to data from Schwanstecher et al (23), suggesting complete displacement of [ 3 H]glibenclamide by pinacidil and diazoxide at SUR1, but is in accordance with previous results showing displacement only to ϳ80% (l-pinacidil) and ϳ50% (diazoxide) at SUR1 or the splice variant SUR1⌬17 (20). This suggests the existence of SUR1 complexes in which glibenclamide and openers are bound simultaneously (8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, the increase in [ 3 H]glibenclamide binding seen with wild-type SUR1, indicating additional positive allosteric interactions at lower concentrations of these openers at SUR1, is missing at SUR1(T1285L, M1289T). One could speculate that the observed allosteric effects are due to molecular interactions within the SUR monomer or even between subunits of the SUR tetramer as already proposed for allosteric coupling between nucleotide, opener, and sulfonylurea binding to tetrameric SUR2 (8). According to such an assumption, the nature of allosteric coupling at SUR1 could be profoundly influenced by mutation in TM17.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Both methods gave identical results (see e.g., Russ et al, 1999;Hambrock et al, 2001;Löffler-Walz et al, 2002). Nonspecific binding ranged from 40 to 60% of total binding (SUR2); in the case of SUR1, nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 100 nM glibenclamide and was approximately 10%.…”
Section: Materials [mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Kir6.2/SUR2 channels, which already possess a tyrosine at this position, also show reversible block by glibenclamide and glimepiride. In addition, glibenclamide binding to SUR1 is greatly decreased by the S1237Y mutation (35), whereas glibenclamide binding to SUR2B is enhanced by the reverse mutation (36,37). Thus S1237 must contribute to the binding site for sulfonylureas on SUR1.…”
Section: Location Of the Sulfonylurea Binding Site On Surmentioning
confidence: 99%