2005
DOI: 10.1656/1528-7092(2005)004[0303:iohifa]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Hybrid Imported Fire Ants (Solenopsis invicta × S. richteri) with Native Ants at Baits in Southeastern Tennessee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, S. richteri x invicta was not found at any nonlogged site, and only two T. sessile individuals were found at one nonlogged site. Hybrid imported Þre ants have been shown to outcompete native ants at disturbed sites in southern Tennessee (Gibbons and Simberloff 2005), but our location near the northern edge of the range of imported Þre ants may limit their overall inßuence on native ant communities (Calcott et al 2000). Several other species (Crematogaster pilosa Emery, Hypoponera inexorata, H. opacior, Monomorium minimum, and Pheidole tysoni (Forel) were found only at recently logged sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Of these, S. richteri x invicta was not found at any nonlogged site, and only two T. sessile individuals were found at one nonlogged site. Hybrid imported Þre ants have been shown to outcompete native ants at disturbed sites in southern Tennessee (Gibbons and Simberloff 2005), but our location near the northern edge of the range of imported Þre ants may limit their overall inßuence on native ant communities (Calcott et al 2000). Several other species (Crematogaster pilosa Emery, Hypoponera inexorata, H. opacior, Monomorium minimum, and Pheidole tysoni (Forel) were found only at recently logged sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Ant competition studies at the colony or population level have typically used numerical surrogates to characterize competitive behavior, such as number of individuals collected at baits (Gibbons and Simberloff 2005;LeBrun et al 2007;Sarty et al 2006) or rate of bait take-over (LeBrun 2005). Studies which have investigated interactions between individual ants have often included analysis of the posture or disposition of the ants during those interactions (for example, Tanner 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of S. geminata × S. xyloni , the ability to produce hybrid workers with non-hybrid reproductive may, in the absence of conspecific mates, provide an option for queens to form a viable colony with hybrid workers that survived better in competitive encounters than the parent species [34,35]. Hybrid imported fire ants, S. invicta × S. richteri , are known to outcompete native species in disturbed habitats [36], and are more tolerant to low temperatures than either parent [37]. Potentially, hybrid ants are capable of occupying marginal habitats not utilized by parent species [38].…”
Section: Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%