2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of energetic clusters (Au3, Au400 and C60) with organic material and adsorbed gold nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the same kinetic energy, Au 400 projectiles were also unable to sputter organic material from metal organic surfaces. 10 Indeed, once again, upon impact on the nanoparticle, the generated recoil atoms have an energy that is too low to cause further sputtering of the organic material. In addition, the same study demonstrated that, for impacts on the organic substrate, much less sputtering could be observed with Au 400 than with C 60 or Au 3 and that the projectile was implanting quite deeply in the solid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the same kinetic energy, Au 400 projectiles were also unable to sputter organic material from metal organic surfaces. 10 Indeed, once again, upon impact on the nanoparticle, the generated recoil atoms have an energy that is too low to cause further sputtering of the organic material. In addition, the same study demonstrated that, for impacts on the organic substrate, much less sputtering could be observed with Au 400 than with C 60 or Au 3 and that the projectile was implanting quite deeply in the solid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of some cluster primary ions (e.g. C 60 + and Bi + 3,5,7 ) on polymer samples do not lead to a yield enhancement on metallized samples, recent molecular dynamic simulations show that, using Au n clusters ions, the sputtering process could be enhanced by metallized samples …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For monatomic ion beams, this hypothesis has been widely supported empirically and theoretically. [34][35][36][37]39,55,56 In a pair of studies, Heile et al 36,43 investigated the relationship between the primary ion beam composition and surface hardness and showed that as the effective thickness of the metal layer increases, there is a tradeoff between an accessible surface (i.e., uncoated area) and hardness. These findings partially explain the previous observation that metallization reduces ionization when polyatomic projectiles are used.…”
Section: Insights Into the Mechanism Of Meta-c 60 -Simsmentioning
confidence: 99%