1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)41248-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of deoxyuridylate with thymidylate synthetase.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
24
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
11
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complete suppression of M1-R78 by dUMP indicates that both subunits of thymidylate synthase have similar conformations in the region including R72 and R78, which agrees with the reported symmetry of the dUMP-bound enzyme observed by Stroud and co-workers (Finer-Moore et al, 1993). However, they reported that dUMP was bound to both active sites, in contrast to previous studies by others indicating that only one dUMP was bound to each enzyme dimer (Galivan et al, 1976;Leary et al, 1975). Although an explanation for that discrepancy is not apparent, our results involving M1-R78 and M1-R72 would be consistent with dUMP binding to both subunits, which would be expected to produce identical changes in the conformation of each subunit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The complete suppression of M1-R78 by dUMP indicates that both subunits of thymidylate synthase have similar conformations in the region including R72 and R78, which agrees with the reported symmetry of the dUMP-bound enzyme observed by Stroud and co-workers (Finer-Moore et al, 1993). However, they reported that dUMP was bound to both active sites, in contrast to previous studies by others indicating that only one dUMP was bound to each enzyme dimer (Galivan et al, 1976;Leary et al, 1975). Although an explanation for that discrepancy is not apparent, our results involving M1-R78 and M1-R72 would be consistent with dUMP binding to both subunits, which would be expected to produce identical changes in the conformation of each subunit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Observations consistent with such changes in conformation include those from stopped-flow kinetic studies of the quenching of tryptophan fluorescence by dUMP, dTMP, and FdUMP binding, which were consistent with a two-step mechanism involving the rapid preequilibrium formation of a binary complex followed by a slower isomerization step . The reported changes in the circular dichroic spectra (Leary et al, 1975) and the protection from heat denaturation (Galivan et al, 1976) and enzymatic digestion (Galivan et al, 1977) that accompany substrate or other ligand binding are also consistent with ligand-induced conformational changes. Evidence for the induction of conformational changes in the C-terminal region of L. casei thymidylate synthase by dUMP has recently been obtained (Carreras et al, 1994).…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, a 7.9-fold excess of dCMP slowed the rate of inactivation to 9030 M-1 s-1. Previous studies by Danenberg et al (1974) and Leary et al (1975) have…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The crystal structures of both Lactobacillus casei (Hardy et al, 1986) and E. coli TS (Matthews et al, 1990 a,b;Montfort et al, 1990) reveal that the enzyme's two identical subunits are held together by a backbone of about 30 amino acid residues with the active site in each subunit widely separated from one another despite the marked change in conformation that occurs on substrate or analogue binding. This being the case, each site should be equally active although a considerable body of evidence exists suggesting either that the two active sites contribute unequally to the enzyme's catalytic efficiency {kcx) or that only one of the two sites is active (Aull et al, 1974;Leary et al, 1975;Galivan et al, 1976a,b;Danenberg & Danenberg, 1979;Beaudette et al, 1980). Paradoxically, other studies suggest that both sites contribute equally to enzyme activity (Plese & Dunlap, 1977), particularly those involving subunit complementation wherein specific inactive mutants of L. casei TS were denatured together with urea and then renaturated by dilution, resulting in the restoration of enzyme activity (Perry et al, 1992;Pookanjanatavip et al, 1992;Carreras et al, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%