2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of damage failure and post-buckling behaviour of composite plates with cut-outs by progressive damage modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several material degradation methods can be found in the literature [21][22][23][24]. Existing methods for damage modeling can be separated into two categories; methods that rely on ply discount techniques and methods that are based on continuum damage mechanics.…”
Section: Failure Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several material degradation methods can be found in the literature [21][22][23][24]. Existing methods for damage modeling can be separated into two categories; methods that rely on ply discount techniques and methods that are based on continuum damage mechanics.…”
Section: Failure Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies have mainly focused on the progressive failure analysis of composite plates with cut-outs [21][22][23][24], since the stress concentrations developed at the edge of the cut-outs lead to guided failure paths, offering a well defined case for benchmarking and validation of the developed progressive failure models. To the authors' knowledge, progressive failure analysis of composite stiffened panels has not been sufficiently studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDM methodology is well-established and has been successfully applied for the prediction of damage initiation and evolution of structures made of composite materials (e.g., Gotsis et al, 1998;Kermanidis et al, 2000;Tserpes et al, 2001Tserpes et al, , 2002Tserpes et al, , 2004Labeas et al, 2008;Haj-Ali, 2009;Ju et al, 2009;Zhang and Wang, 2010). However, its application, according to authors' best knowledge, has been limited at rather small-scale structures, including simple geometry specimens, as well as more complicated bolted and bonded joints.…”
Section: Description Of Specific Problems Arising From Pdm Application In Large-scale Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology of progressive damage modeling (PDM) has been widely applied in the prediction of damage development in various types of composite structures (e.g., Gotsis et al, 1998;Kermanidis et al, 2000;Tserpes et al, 2001Tserpes et al, , 2002Tserpes et al, , 2004Labeas et al, 2008;Tay et al, 2008;Haj-Ali, 2009;Ju et al, 2009;Zhang and Wang, 2010). However, the application of PDM in large-scale structures, which require multi-million degrees of freedom (DOF) numerical models for their stress analysis, has specific significant problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the progressive damage method has increasingly been used to predict the failure of composite structures [Sane, Padole and Uddanwadiker (2018)], and many PDMs have been proposed in published papers. Some use sudden degradation damage models, which are implemented by decreasing the damaged material properties to zero or to a portion of the initial values, to describe the mechanical properties of the damaged materials [Labeas, Belesis and Stamatelos (2008)]. Clearly, the sudden degradation damage models divide the materials into two states: undamaged and completely damaged.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%