1984
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(84)90006-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Co with an Fe(111) surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
2
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
49
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…33 It predicts that two, three, and four-fold coordinated CO species form the most stable binding geometry in Fe 3,4 , Fe 5 , and Fe 6 , respectively. The reported CO stretching frequencies for these species are significantly below our experimental values for CO atop bound to Fe [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] , as would be expected. Unfortunately, we were unable to measure clusters this small to confirm the transition from high coordination binding in small clusters to atop binding in large clusters, that has some parallels in rhodium cluster CO complexes.…”
Section: A Ironcontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33 It predicts that two, three, and four-fold coordinated CO species form the most stable binding geometry in Fe 3,4 , Fe 5 , and Fe 6 , respectively. The reported CO stretching frequencies for these species are significantly below our experimental values for CO atop bound to Fe [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] , as would be expected. Unfortunately, we were unable to measure clusters this small to confirm the transition from high coordination binding in small clusters to atop binding in large clusters, that has some parallels in rhodium cluster CO complexes.…”
Section: A Ironcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…For instance, for CO on Fe(111) three vibrational bands at 2000, 1805, and 1530 cm -1 were assigned to C-O stretching frequencies for carbon monoxide bound to atop, shallow hollow, and deep hollow sites on the surface, respectively. 23 CO on Fe(100) has been suggested to be tilted or side-on bound yielding a very low ν(CO) frequency around 1200 cm -1 at low coverage, whereas binding to 2-fold hollow sites (2020 cm -1 ) or on atop sites (2070 cm -1 ) was concluded to occur at higher coverage. 18,[24][25][26] These frequencies appear very high compared to the 1865 cm -1 we assign to atop bound CO adsorbed to iron clusters.…”
Section: A Ironmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sticking coefficient is close to unity and remains constant up to 60% of a monolayer on Fe(l 00) [383] and up to 40% of a monolayer on Fe(111) [437] indicating the existence of a mobile precursor for the adsorption. The sticking coefficient decreases with temperature.…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…On Fe(111) 3 different coordinations have been observed [437]. High-resolution electron-energy-Ioss spectroscopy spectra of C + 0/Fe(111) show the Fe-C stretch at 420 cm -1 and the Fe-O stretch at 540 cm -1 [437].…”
Section: Properties Of Chemisorbed Comentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation