1994
DOI: 10.1109/49.310962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of call blocking and cell loss in an ATM network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity of the maximum feasible call request rate to buffer size Using the parameters of Table I and a given buffer size, we repeatedly solved the LP of Section 2.5 for a range of call request rates. Comparing the call blocking probabilities obtained to the QoS constraint, p call ; we arrived at the maximum feasible call request rate, l n ; for which there exists a CAC policy satisfying both packet and call level QoS requirements (see (2)), for a buffer Figure 1. Note from Figure 1 that, at least over the small range of buffer sizes for which we computed LP solutions, a small increase of the buffer size dramatically increases the maximum feasible call request rate, l n : From these results, we can conclude that the consideration of buffers in modelling and analyzing the switch performance can make a significant difference.…”
Section: Optimal Policy and Effect Of Bufferingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity of the maximum feasible call request rate to buffer size Using the parameters of Table I and a given buffer size, we repeatedly solved the LP of Section 2.5 for a range of call request rates. Comparing the call blocking probabilities obtained to the QoS constraint, p call ; we arrived at the maximum feasible call request rate, l n ; for which there exists a CAC policy satisfying both packet and call level QoS requirements (see (2)), for a buffer Figure 1. Note from Figure 1 that, at least over the small range of buffer sizes for which we computed LP solutions, a small increase of the buffer size dramatically increases the maximum feasible call request rate, l n : From these results, we can conclude that the consideration of buffers in modelling and analyzing the switch performance can make a significant difference.…”
Section: Optimal Policy and Effect Of Bufferingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a substantial literature in this area (see [13], [21], [11], [23] and references therein). With very few exceptions, such as [4] and [11], the published work has focused on cell level QoS, such as cell loss ratio, cell delay and cell delay variation. Most CAC schemes are based on the well-known concept of effective bandwidth, which has been studied extensively (see [3], [6], [10], [14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, however, the number of calls being multiplexed is not fixed but forms the call-level process which is subject to blocking. Little work has appeared on the inclusion of the call-level process in admission control and bandwidth allocation at an ATM multiplexor [4]. In this paper we study admission control at an ATM multiplexor with call blocking and cell loss.…”
Section: : Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%