1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)33442-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of bacterial initiation factor 2 with initiator tRNA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present in vitro mischarging studies show that tRNA™6'(GAC) and tRNA™6'(GAA) are less efficiently aminoacylated by valyl-and phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetases than wild-type cognate tRNAs (Figure 2). In addition, previous studies have shown that both E. coli transformylase and initiation factor 2 prefer methionine to non-methionine amino acids (Giege et al, 1973a,b;Sundari et al, 1976); thus, a combination of reduced efficiency in several steps in the initiation pathway is likely to contribute to the lower level of protein synthesized in the presence of the mutant initiator tRNAs. Little is known about the amino acid requirement for initiation of protein synthesis in eukaryotic systems; however, in vitro experiments have indicated that eukaryotic IF-2 strongly discriminates against the mammalian initiator tRNA when it is mischarged with isoleucine (Wagner et al, 1984), suggesting that higher organisms may have evolved in a manner that more strictly prohibits the use of non-methionine amino acids in the initiation pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present in vitro mischarging studies show that tRNA™6'(GAC) and tRNA™6'(GAA) are less efficiently aminoacylated by valyl-and phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetases than wild-type cognate tRNAs (Figure 2). In addition, previous studies have shown that both E. coli transformylase and initiation factor 2 prefer methionine to non-methionine amino acids (Giege et al, 1973a,b;Sundari et al, 1976); thus, a combination of reduced efficiency in several steps in the initiation pathway is likely to contribute to the lower level of protein synthesized in the presence of the mutant initiator tRNAs. Little is known about the amino acid requirement for initiation of protein synthesis in eukaryotic systems; however, in vitro experiments have indicated that eukaryotic IF-2 strongly discriminates against the mammalian initiator tRNA when it is mischarged with isoleucine (Wagner et al, 1984), suggesting that higher organisms may have evolved in a manner that more strictly prohibits the use of non-methionine amino acids in the initiation pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For IF-2 its, albeit weak, affinity for N-blocked aminoacyl-tRNA (Majumdar et al, 1976;Sundari et al, 1976;Leon et al, 1979;Petersen et al, 1979) might suggest a direct effect of the factor on the ribosome-bound ¿V-AcPhe-tRNA. On the other hand, it has been shown that IF-2 binding does not increase the affinity of the nonprogrammed 30S ribosomal subunit for either Ar-AcPhe-tRNAphe or fMet-tRNAf1'1 ; C. L. Pon and C. Gualerzi, unpublished results), making unlikely an appreciable binding interaction between IF-2 and N-blocked aminoacyl-tRNA on the ribosome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IF2 is responsible for recognition of the formyl group of fMet-tRNA fMet (Antoun et al, 2006b;Majumdar et al, 1976;Sundari et al, 1976). IF2 in the GTP form promotes the recruitment of fMet-tRNA fMet to the 30S PIC (Milon et al, 2010) and ensures adjustment of initiator tRNA in the ribosomal P-site (Antoun et al, 2006b;Lockwood et al, 1971;La Teana et al, 1996) and mRNA restructuring during the formation of 30S IC (Studer and Joseph, 2006).…”
Section: Functions In Initiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of the formyl group is an important determinant which distinguishes initiator from elongator tRNAs (Kozak, 1999;RajBhandary, 1994). The formyl group attached to methionine on the tRNA fMet favors selection of fMet-tRNA fMet by IF2 (Sundari et al, 1976) and prevents its binding to EF-Tu (Hansen et al, 1986;Nissen et al, 1995;Seong and RajBhandary, 1987). In most cases formylated methionine is removed from the polypeptide chain after the translation has started (Bingel-Erlenmeyer et al, 2008;Bonissone et al, 2013;Kozak, 1983).…”
Section: Initiator Trnamentioning
confidence: 99%