1998
DOI: 10.1021/la970969+
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Alcohols with Surface Hydroxyls on Chromium(III) Oxide

Abstract: Physical and chemical adsorption of methanol and ethanol on the hydroxylated chromium oxide surface was studied. Surface hydroxyls were classified into three groups according to their reactivity with alcohols. Both methanol and ethanol are physisorbed on the first group surface hydroxyls which can be adsorption sites for H2O molecules giving rise to the two-dimensional (2D) condensation. The second ones are active hydroxyls for H2O adsorption and also are reactive with alcohol adsorption to give surface alkoxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason that the thickness calculated from the ATR-IR data is lower than that from the QCM data might be due to slight temperature difference between the environment-controlled chamber and the ATR-IR unit. The observed trend of the n-propanol film thickness as a function of partial pressure is consistent with the general characteristic of the alcohol adsorption isotherm observed for other systems [23][24][25]. However, it should be noted that the thickness data shown in figure 2 are measured for gold (in QCM) and Ge (in ATR-IR) substrates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The reason that the thickness calculated from the ATR-IR data is lower than that from the QCM data might be due to slight temperature difference between the environment-controlled chamber and the ATR-IR unit. The observed trend of the n-propanol film thickness as a function of partial pressure is consistent with the general characteristic of the alcohol adsorption isotherm observed for other systems [23][24][25]. However, it should be noted that the thickness data shown in figure 2 are measured for gold (in QCM) and Ge (in ATR-IR) substrates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Similar conclusions about these dual adsorption pathways and the evolution of water from the metal oxide surfaces have been drawn by Suda et al, Farneth et al., Busca et al, and others. ,, These studies and the present results clearly indicate that quantitative chemisorption measurements must either measure the methoxylated surface species directly by IR spectroscopy (CeO 2 , ZnO,MgO, MoO 3 , SiO 2 , and ZrO 2 51 ), or measure the water desorbed upon adsorption if gravimetric methods are used. , However, the absence of Lewis-bound water after methanol chemisorption on virtually all catalysts tested in the present investigation suggests that higher temperature methanol chemisorption (110 °C) forces the water equilibrium toward the vapor phase and allows for the assumption of complete water loss (relevant to gravimetric methods).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Finally, a number of related studies have quantitatively measured the adsorption isotherms of methanol on metal oxides using IR, calorimetric, gravimetric, and volumetric methods, although not necessarily for the purpose of active site determinations. Generally, the isotherms were of either the Langmuir type (Al 2 O 3 , Cr 2 O 3 , MgO, β-MoO 3 , SiO 2 , TiO 2 , and ZnO), the Elovich/Temkin type (α-MoO 3 31-33 and ZnO 37 ), or BET type II (MgO and TiO 2 ). Other isotherm and saturation coverages are found elsewhere for CeO 2 , MoO 3 , , heteropoly-Mo, TiO 2 , , and ZrO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dual-pathway methanol chemisorption mechanism was similarly found to occur in supported metal oxide catalysts (see part 1 7 of the present two-paper series 7 ), and has been investigated on other metal oxides by Suda et al, Farneth et al, Busca et al, and others. ,, It was also shown in part 1 7 that the intact, surface Lewis-bound methanol species (species I) is generally stable to high temperatures (at least 100−200 °C) on Lewis-acidic surfaces even under vacuum. The adsorption temperature of 110 °C employed in part 1 7 and in the present study, which is well above the boiling point of methanol at and below 1 atm, ensures that methoxylated surface species I is, in fact, a strongly Lewis-bound surface moiety and is not due to weakly physisorbed and perhaps multilayered methanol present at room temperature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%