2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-012-5000-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of aerodynamic roughness length and windflow conditions and its parameterization over vegetation surface

Abstract: Surface aerodynamic roughness length is usually taken as a constant. In fact, it displays a remarkable dynamic change over underlying vegetation surfaces, because of the coupling of land surface roughness elements and windflow conditions. Current international research on this dynamic change and associated mechanisms is very limited. Using observations from different underlying surfaces (including forest, farmland and grassland) provided by a northern China coordinated observation test, the variation of aerody… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the R 2 values are not high (maximum value of 0.3696), these results indicate that the wind speed at 5 m possibly has an influence on the z0m over sparse Tamarix at Si Daoqiao site. This finding is consistent with discussions in the literature that meteorological factors could influence the z0m [35,36].…”
Section: Relationship Analysessupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the R 2 values are not high (maximum value of 0.3696), these results indicate that the wind speed at 5 m possibly has an influence on the z0m over sparse Tamarix at Si Daoqiao site. This finding is consistent with discussions in the literature that meteorological factors could influence the z0m [35,36].…”
Section: Relationship Analysessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A z0m experiment over arid South Tunisia during the spring of 2000 [36] found that the field average z0m is 0.353 m for sparse olive trees that are 3 m high with a spacing of 23 m. Thus, the z0m results in this study are comparable to published field results.…”
Section: The Rationality Of Z0msupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Several methods have been used based on this theory to evaluate the statistical turbulence variables (friction velocity, surface roughness length, Obukhov length, etc.) [39][40][41][42][43][44]. We determined the surface friction velocity * u using the momentum flows ' ' u v (covariance of vertical and longitudinal wind component) and ' ' v w (covariance of vertical and transversal wind component) along with the Monin-Obukhov theory:…”
Section: Friction Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little change in crop height or canopy area index occurred at our desert site during spring, thus z 0 remained constant. Zhang et al (2012) reported that z 0 undergoes a dynamic change over vegetation surfaces due to interactions between vegetation and wind flow. Toure et al (2011) reported that there was a good relation between z 0 and crop residue cover.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%