1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-624x(97)00007-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of a guided wave with a nonuniform adhesion bond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two situations were considered: (a) lap splice joint disbonds detected as a loss of reception signal due to the signal no longer leaking across the splice; and (b) tearstrap disbond or corrosion observed as an increase of the reception signal due to the signal no longer leaking away in the tear strap. The use of Lamb waves for disbond detection was also reported by Singher et al (1997), Mustafa and Chahbaz (1997), and Todd and Challis (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Two situations were considered: (a) lap splice joint disbonds detected as a loss of reception signal due to the signal no longer leaking across the splice; and (b) tearstrap disbond or corrosion observed as an increase of the reception signal due to the signal no longer leaking away in the tear strap. The use of Lamb waves for disbond detection was also reported by Singher et al (1997), Mustafa and Chahbaz (1997), and Todd and Challis (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…With both the Green function (11) and the displacement fieldÛ q ðx; z q Þ satisfying the same Neumann boundary condition at the outer surface ðÀL q =2Þ of each plate, the integral formulation equivalent to the problem inside the plates stated above (3a)-(3d), which involves domains D q 0 ¼ ½x 2 ð0; 1Þ; z q 2 ðÀL q =2; L q =2Þ and D q ¼ ½x 2 ð0; 1Þ; z q 2 ðÀL q =2; Z q Þ; can be written as follows (the source term being described by an adapted functionŜ q ðz q Þ at the entrance x 0 ¼ 0 of each plate): 39,40 ðx; z q Þ 2 ðD q Þ;Û q ðx; z q Þ ðx; z q Þ 2 ðD…”
Section: B the Integral Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can quote, among others, characterization and evaluation of adhesion, detection of defects, and lack of adhesion. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Concerning the rheological models used to describe the behavior of the glue and the interfaces between it and the structure, mainly two basic models are involved: a cohesive rheological model that corresponds to the standard approach in which the entire adhesive layer is replaced by a spring surface, and an adhesive rheological model which consists in describing only the contact zones by a spring surface distribution (among inertia and dissipation). 13,14 Indeed, the cohesive rheological model makes it possible to quantify global (cohesive) defects in the adhesive layer, while the adhesive rheological model targets local (adhesive) defects on the interface level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facecore interfacial debonding is a critical issue that causes the failure of sandwich structures 6,7 ; this is because debonding at the adhered regions between the facesheets and the core may occur due to manufacturing flaws or in-service damage. [8][9][10][11] Debonded regions can lead to crack growth, strength and stiffness reduction, and failure. The flexural rigidity, stiffness and strength reductions are more significant for a longer debonded region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%