Interaction matters: Quantifying Conduct Problem × Depressive Symptoms interaction and its association with adolescent alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use in a national sample
Abstract:Substance use is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality among American adolescents. Conduct problems and depressive symptoms have each been associated with adolescent substance use. Although they are highly comorbid, the relation of the interaction of conduct problems and depressive symptoms to substance use in not clear. In a national sample of 8th, 10th, and 12th grade students from Monitoring the Future surveys, latent moderated structural equation modeling was used to estimate the association of co… Show more
“…Adolescents with comorbid depressive and conduct symptoms did not endorse unique items in comparison with early adolescents who endorsed only depressive or conduct symptoms; however, they did endorse a greater number and severity of symptoms (Mezulis et al, 2006). Substance use is considered nonnormative behavior during the middle school years (Maslowsky & Schulenberg, 2013). For adolescents with comorbid depressive and conduct symptoms, the use of substances may simply reflect the greater severity of distress or poorer general emotional health status.…”
This study investigates whether co-occurring depressive and conduct symptoms in early adolescence are associated with an elevated occurrence of early onset substance. Five hundred twenty-one sixth graders were assessed for depressive symptoms and conduct problems and underwent five substance use assessments during middle school. Logistic regression analyses were used to compare lifetime substance use across subgroups with and without depressive symptoms and conduct problems. Adolescents with co-occurring problems were more likely to have used alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, other drugs, and any substance compared with adolescents with neither type of symptom (adjusted odds ratio [OR] range = 2.5-3.5), and were more likely to report alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, and any substance use compared with adolescents with depressive symptoms only (adjusted OR range = 0.1-0.3). Conduct problems modify the effect of depressive symptoms on early adolescent substance use. Early screening for depression and conduct problems may be helpful in targeting substance use prevention efforts.
“…Adolescents with comorbid depressive and conduct symptoms did not endorse unique items in comparison with early adolescents who endorsed only depressive or conduct symptoms; however, they did endorse a greater number and severity of symptoms (Mezulis et al, 2006). Substance use is considered nonnormative behavior during the middle school years (Maslowsky & Schulenberg, 2013). For adolescents with comorbid depressive and conduct symptoms, the use of substances may simply reflect the greater severity of distress or poorer general emotional health status.…”
This study investigates whether co-occurring depressive and conduct symptoms in early adolescence are associated with an elevated occurrence of early onset substance. Five hundred twenty-one sixth graders were assessed for depressive symptoms and conduct problems and underwent five substance use assessments during middle school. Logistic regression analyses were used to compare lifetime substance use across subgroups with and without depressive symptoms and conduct problems. Adolescents with co-occurring problems were more likely to have used alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, other drugs, and any substance compared with adolescents with neither type of symptom (adjusted odds ratio [OR] range = 2.5-3.5), and were more likely to report alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, and any substance use compared with adolescents with depressive symptoms only (adjusted OR range = 0.1-0.3). Conduct problems modify the effect of depressive symptoms on early adolescent substance use. Early screening for depression and conduct problems may be helpful in targeting substance use prevention efforts.
“…Although Conduct Problems (CPs) and other externalizing problems are well-established risk factors for adolescent substance use (King et al, 2004; Maslowsky et al, 2013), the role of internalizing symptomatology (IntSx) in teen substance use risk is less clear. Some research shows that anxiety and depression are associated with subsequent substance use in adolescents (Buckner et al, 2008; Crum et al, 2008; King et al, 2004; Sartor et al, 2007); however, results are not always replicated (Pardini et al, 2007) and do not appear to be as strong as the corresponding risk of substance use associated with CPs (King et al, 2004; Maslowsky and Schulenberg, 2013). Further complicating matters, there is considerable comorbidity between CPs and IntSx in teens (Lewinsohn et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, evidence indicates that both forms of psychopathology are associated with substance use independent of one another (Connor et al, 2004; Crum et al, 2008; Ingoldsby et al, 2006; King et al, 2004), incrementally to one another (Brook et al, 2015; Ingoldsby et al, 2006; Lansford et al, 2008), and interactively (e.g., Marmorstein and Iacono, 2001; Maslowsky and Schulenberg, 2013). These latter studies of adolescents have found that high levels of both CPs and depressive symptoms are associated with a disproportionately larger increase in risk for substance use than either disorder independently (i.e., synergistic interaction; Marmorstein and Iacono, 2001; Maslowsky and Schulenberg, 2013; Miller-Johnson et al, 1998; Pardini et al, 2007). However, research has yet to examine whether this interactive relationship exists between CPs and other forms of IntSx, such as the various type of anxiety disorder symptoms often present in adolescents (Grant et al, 2004).…”
Aim
The complex interplay of externalizing and internalizing problems in substance use risk is not well understood. This study tested whether the relationship of conduct problems and several internalizing disorders with future substance use is redundant, incremental, or interactive in adolescents.
Methods
Two semiannual waves of data from the Happiness and Health Study were used, which included 3,383 adolescents (M age = 14.1 years old; 53% females) in Los Angeles who were beginning high school at baseline. Logistic regression models tested the likelihood of past six-month alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, and any substance use at follow-up conditional on baseline conduct problems, symptoms of one of several internalizing disorders (i.e., Social Phobia and Major Depressive, Generalized Anxiety, Panic, and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder), and their interaction adjusting for baseline use and other covariates.
Findings
Conduct problems were a robust and consistent risk factor of each substance use outcome at follow-up. When adjusting for internalizing-conduct comorbidity, depressive symptoms were the only internalizing problem whose risk for alcohol, tobacco, and any substance use was incremental to conduct problems. With the exception of social phobia, antagonistic interactive relationships between each internalizing disorder and conduct problems when predicting any substance use were found; internalizing symptoms was a more robust risk factor for substance use in teens with low (vs. high) conduct problems.
Conclusions
Although internalizing and externalizing problems both generally increase risk of substance use, a closer look reveals important nuances in these risk pathways, particularly among teens with comorbid externalizing and internalizing problems.
“…stealing, lying, skipping school, fighting) reflect a range of externalizing behaviors that are strongly associated with adolescent substance use (Brown et al 1996; Connor, Steingard, Cunningham, Anderson, & Melloni, 2004; Couwenbergh et al, 2006; King, Iacono, & McGue, 2004; Maslowsky & Schulenberg, 2013). In addition to more severe behaviors seen only in Conduct Disorder (e.g.…”
The present study tested the hypothesis that teens who engage in conduct problems are more likely to use substances because they engage in fewer alternative reinforcing (i.e., pleasurable) substance-free activities and more complementary reinforcing substance-associated activities. In a cross-sectional, correlational design, ninth grade students (N=3,396; mean age=14.6 years) in Los Angeles, California, USA completed surveys in 2013 measuring conduct problems (e.g., stealing, lying, getting in fights), alternative and complementary reinforcement, use of a number of licit, illicit, and prescription drugs, and other co-factors. Conduct problems were positively associated with past six-month use of any substance (yes/no) among the overall sample and past 30-day use frequency on a composite index that included six substances among past six-month users. These associations were statistically mediated by diminished alternative reinforcement and increased complementary reinforcement when adjusting for relevant covariates. Conduct problems were associated with lower engagement in alternative reinforcers and increased engagement in complementary reinforcers, which, in turn, was associated with greater likelihood and frequency of substance use. Most mediational relations persisted adjusting for demographic, environmental, and intrapersonal co-factors and generalized to alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use; though, complementary reinforcers did not significantly mediate the relation of CPs with alcohol use frequency. These results point to diminished alternative reinforcement and increased complementary reinforcement as mechanisms linking conduct problems and adolescent substance use. Interventions that increase access to and engagement in a diverse set of alternative substance-free activities and deter activities that complement use may prevent substance use in adolescents who engage in conduct problems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.