2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction in teacher communities: Three forms teachers use to express contrasting ideas in video clubs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, this principle calls for both introducing multiple voices and attending to, exploring, and building upon them (Grossman et al, 2001). Dobie and Anderson (2015) discuss three forms of talk through which teachers in their study expressed contrasting ideas: In “serial turns,” teachers did not attend to one another’s ideas, and the discussions were short-lived; in “implicit critique,” participants often hid their disagreements “behind partial agreements, hesitations, and carefully chosen language” (p. 237), thereby making focused conversation more difficult; in contrast, more productive discussions occurred in the “open discussion” pattern, in which interlocuters disagreed openly and directly. Popp and Goldman (2016) illustrate this process of teachers building on one another’s ideas, as one teacher refines her ideas about teaching text structure after being challenged by her colleagues about whether or not her proposal is age appropriate.…”
Section: Towards Pedagogically Productive Talkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, this principle calls for both introducing multiple voices and attending to, exploring, and building upon them (Grossman et al, 2001). Dobie and Anderson (2015) discuss three forms of talk through which teachers in their study expressed contrasting ideas: In “serial turns,” teachers did not attend to one another’s ideas, and the discussions were short-lived; in “implicit critique,” participants often hid their disagreements “behind partial agreements, hesitations, and carefully chosen language” (p. 237), thereby making focused conversation more difficult; in contrast, more productive discussions occurred in the “open discussion” pattern, in which interlocuters disagreed openly and directly. Popp and Goldman (2016) illustrate this process of teachers building on one another’s ideas, as one teacher refines her ideas about teaching text structure after being challenged by her colleagues about whether or not her proposal is age appropriate.…”
Section: Towards Pedagogically Productive Talkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fostering cultures in which teachers in CIs can push on each others' ideas and offer professional critique is difficult (Dobie & Anderson, 2015;van Es, 2012); however when CIs are able to engage in these deep discussions, there is room for reflection and improved practice (Dobie & Anderson, 2015;Hadar & Brody, 2010;Stoll et al, 2006). Thus discovering specific combinations of conditions that promote deep discussions is critically important.…”
Section: Combinations Of Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reflects how critical discussion can be key to developing teacher CoPs (van Es, 2012). Dobie and Anderson (2015) found that expressing an opposing opinion could improve the quality of collaboration and decision-making within a community. Thus, by contributing to critical discussions with colleagues, teachers can potentially modify their beliefs and improve their professional practices (Achinstein, 2002;Grossman et al, 2001;Mitchell, 2015).…”
Section: Communities Of Practicementioning
confidence: 94%