2001
DOI: 10.1110/ps.52001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction energies between β‐lactam antibiotics and E. coli penicillin‐binding protein 5 by reversible thermal denaturation

Abstract: Penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) catalyze the final stages of bacterial cell wall biosynthesis. PBPs form stable covalent complexes with ␤-lactam antibiotics, leading to PBP inactivation and ultimately cell death. To understand more clearly how PBPs recognize ␤-lactam antibiotics, it is important to know their energies of interaction. Because ␤-lactam antibiotics bind covalently to PBPs, these energies are difficult to measure through binding equilibria. However, the noncovalent interaction energies between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are similar, however, to those we reported for E. coli PBP 5, where, in crystal structures of acylated complexes, electron density for the R1/R2 substituents of various β-lactams was also consistently weak and did not correlate with acylation rates 29 . Such data reinforce the notion that acylated complexes of PBPs with β-lactams may only be of limited value when rationally designing new inhibitors of PBPs because these may not reveal interactions that occurred during acylation 23 . In support of this, crystal structures of the AmpC β-lactamase in the pre-covalent, acylated and post-covalent product state show significantly different modes of binding for cephalothin 30 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are similar, however, to those we reported for E. coli PBP 5, where, in crystal structures of acylated complexes, electron density for the R1/R2 substituents of various β-lactams was also consistently weak and did not correlate with acylation rates 29 . Such data reinforce the notion that acylated complexes of PBPs with β-lactams may only be of limited value when rationally designing new inhibitors of PBPs because these may not reveal interactions that occurred during acylation 23 . In support of this, crystal structures of the AmpC β-lactamase in the pre-covalent, acylated and post-covalent product state show significantly different modes of binding for cephalothin 30 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…For N. gonorrhoeae PBP 2, two cephalosporins (ceftriaxone and cefixime) both exhibit markedly higher rates of acylation compared to penicillin G 18 , which is opposite to PBPA. Finally, for E. coli PBP 5, the corresponding order of acylation rates is cefoxitin (a cephalosporin) > imipenem > cloxacillin (a penicillin) 23 . Two points emerge from such data: 1) the acylation rates vary for the same antibiotic against different PBPs, and 2) rates for different antibiotics directed against the same PBP also vary and appear specific for that target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…low K d values, appears not to be required for achieving high potency. Consistent with these conclusions is the recent observation that k 2 /K d values of a PBP with different ␤-lactams do not correlate with the interaction energies (which reflect the complementarity of a ligand) between the PBP and the ␤-lactams based on thermal denaturation studies of E. coli PBP5, indicating that a complementary fit of a ␤-lactam to PBP is not required for acylation (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Excluding atoms that were not visible in the electron density ( i.e. were modeled with zero occupancy), the area occluded by antibiotic in each of the three complexes was calculated and compared with the second order rate constant of acylation and the non-covalent interaction energy for the same antibiotics, as determined by Beadle et al (12) (Table 2). Even though cloxacillin occludes the greatest surface area of PBP 5 (258 Å 2 ), it exhibits the lowest rate of acylation with PBP 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst it might be assumed that, like non-covalent inhibitors, β-lactams with the highest affinity and therefore with the highest complementarity with the active site of a PBP would be the most potent inhibitors, PBPs do not bind β-lactams more tightly than peptide substrates (13), making it unlikely that the non-covalent affinity is the primary parameter that dictates the efficacy of enzyme inactivation. In support of this, there is a lack of correlation between the non-covalent interaction energy (a measure of complementarity) of a β-lactam complex of E. coli PBP 5 and the k 2 / K S value of that β-lactam against the same PBP (12). A related issue is whether induced fit contributes to the inhibition of PBPs by β-lactams because the highest extent of interaction might occur in the acylation transition state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%