Interaction effects of zooplankton and CO₂ on phytoplankton communities and the deep chlorophyll maximum

Abstract

Studies examining the consequences of increased partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) in freshwater ecosystems associated with climate change have focused on direct effects for phytoplankton, showing increases in primary productivity, biomass or altered composition. However, in lakes, phytoplankton dynamics are also regulated by zooplankton predation and thermal stratification which can lead to a concentration of phytoplankton biomass in a deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM) layer, making the response to CO2 increase important to understand here. Mesocosm experiments were conducted in a meso‐oligotrophic north temperate lake with a strong summer phytoplankton DCM, to estimate the independent and interaction effects of zooplankton grazing and elevated pCO2 on water column phytoplankton communities and on DCM characteristics. Interaction of CO2 effects with zooplankton grazing occurred for three of four phytoplankton spectral groups, influencing water column phytoplankton biomass. Zooplankton selective grazing appeared as important as CO2 concentration in controlling phytoplankton population and biomass. Unexpectedly, CO2 had an overall negative effect on phytoplankton total biomass despite positive productivity responses. Elevated CO2 led to more peaked (stronger vertical gradient) mid‐water column chlorophyll distribution, but to smaller DCM peaks overall. Zooplankton had unexpected effects, inducing clustering of more edible phytoplankton and greater temporal variation in the DCM. Our experiment points to interactions in the microbial food web and stoichiometric considerations with nutrient addition that should be explored further in future work with realistic lake food webs to better understand these complex responses to CO2.

Intra‐annual variation of phytoplankton community responses to factorial N, P, and CO2 enrichment in a temperate mesotrophic lake

“…The same could be said for Chl a in N‐poor mesocosms. An alternative method would have been to periodically supplement treatment mesocosms with highly CO 2 supersaturated water and controls with untreated water (Paquette & Beisner, ). However, this method results in a series of pulses, contrary to what may be expected due to increasing atmospheric CO 2 .…”

Carbon dioxide limitation of benthic primary production in a boreal lake

“…Effects of CO 2 on GPP in natural systems may depend on and be obscured by nutrient limitation (Jansson et al, 2012), grazing (Paquette & Beisner, 2018), algal biomass (Spijkerman, 2010), and algal community structure (Hopkinson et al, 2010). In our study, all these factors were probably similar across treatments since the cores were collected in close vicinity to each other.…”