2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between trypsin and alginate: An ITC and DLS approach to the formation of insoluble complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, the particle size distribution of alginate−protein complexes has been determined by DLS. 16,26,40 However, the protein alginate interactions at pH 2.65 and 4.0 led to large particles that phase-separated and sedimented rapidly. Therefore, a Master- sizer flow-through cell and laser diffraction was used for the precipitating systems, while alginates and proteins were analyzed individually by conventional DLS (Figure 4A).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, the particle size distribution of alginate−protein complexes has been determined by DLS. 16,26,40 However, the protein alginate interactions at pH 2.65 and 4.0 led to large particles that phase-separated and sedimented rapidly. Therefore, a Master- sizer flow-through cell and laser diffraction was used for the precipitating systems, while alginates and proteins were analyzed individually by conventional DLS (Figure 4A).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alginate and β-Lg have been reported to form smaller particles at pH 2.0 (200 nm) than at pH 4.0 (1000–5000 nm). , The particle size distribution was determined to elucidate if this pertains to the higher ionic strength used in the present study and if it was influenced by the M/G ratio. Previously, the particle size distribution of alginate–protein complexes has been determined by DLS. ,, However, the protein alginate interactions at pH 2.65 and 4.0 led to large particles that phase-separated and sedimented rapidly. Therefore, a Mastersizer flow-through cell and laser diffraction was used for the precipitating systems, while alginates and proteins were analyzed individually by conventional DLS (Figure A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, biochemical and biophysical techniques are attractive and developed dramatically to be the first choice in studying biomolecular interactions. Examples include spectroscopic techniques [13][14][15][16][17][18], surface plasma resonance (SPR) [19][20][21], isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) [22][23][24] and microscale thermophoresis (MST) [25][26][27]. This review will discuss thermophoresis in the characterization of biomolecular interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ITC is a direct and common technique for investigating biomolecular interactions, evaluating thermodynamics of ligand-protein interactions and studying the binding constant. 20,21 Here, the ITC has been used to study the combination of TGB-HSA and TGB-BSA, respectively. The calorimetric titration data at pH 7.4 and 298 K are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Tgb-hsa And Tgb-bsa Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%