2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.10.26.465782
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction Between Transcribing RNA Polymerase and Topoisomerase I Prevents R-loop Formation in E. coli

Abstract: Bacterial topoisomerase I (TopoI) removes excessive negative supercoiling and is thought to relax DNA molecules during transcription, replication and other processes. Using ChIP-Seq, we show that TopoI of Escherichia coli (EcTopoI) is co-localized, genome-wide, with RNA polymerase (RNAP) in transcription units. Treatment with transcription elongation inhibitor rifampicin leads to EcTopoI relocation to promoter regions, where RNAP also accumulates. When a 14 kDa RNAP-binding EcTopoI C-terminal domain (CTD) is o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(143 reference statements)
6
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9A), from 23% (of all differentially expressed genes) in the lowest quartile, up to 65% in the highest quartile. In line with previous results (25), this observation suggests that topoI participates in active transcription, not only at a few highly expressed operons, but as a global mechanism. In contrast, at the transition to stationary phase, the proportion of inhibited vs activated promoters was almost independent of promoter strength (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…9A), from 23% (of all differentially expressed genes) in the lowest quartile, up to 65% in the highest quartile. In line with previous results (25), this observation suggests that topoI participates in active transcription, not only at a few highly expressed operons, but as a global mechanism. In contrast, at the transition to stationary phase, the proportion of inhibited vs activated promoters was almost independent of promoter strength (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We then investigated a possible relation between neighbouring gene orientations and the response to seconeolitsine. Such a relationship was expected for the same reason as the previous observation, since RNAP-generated supercoils accumulate not only behind actively transcribed genes (25), but more specifically between divergent operons (55), as occurs at the leu promoter of S. enterica where this mechanism was discovered (30,56). The orientation of a gene is here defined by the coding DNA strands of its two neighbours relative to it (in the case of tandem genes, the two neighbours belong to the same strand, which can either be the same as the considered gene or the opposite one).…”
Section: Role Of Neighbouring Gene Orientationsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We then analyzed smDNA abundance in intergenic DNA regions for divergent, convergent and co-oriented gene pairs. Divergent and convergent gene orientation is associated with negative and positive DNA supercoiling in intergenic regions, respectively, which could affect smDNA production (38). No significant differences in the amounts of smDNAs were detected for the different types of gene pairs for both pAgos (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%