2008
DOI: 10.1097/mbc.0b013e328304e044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between thrombin mutant W215A/E217A and direct thrombin inhibitor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cluster 1 contained 22.2%, 24.6%, and 16.2% of the conformations in these systems, respectively, a stark contrast to the 3.1% in wild-type thrombin (Figure 4(a)). This shift potentially elucidates the double mutant’s over 19,000-fold decrease in fibrinogen cleavage capability versus a 7-fold reduction in protein C activation[14, 5, 15, 16]. The catalytic triad exhibits two primary conformations: one in cluster 0 (Figure 4(b)), linked to fibrinogen cleavage, and another in cluster 1 (Figure 4(b)), associated with protein C activation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cluster 1 contained 22.2%, 24.6%, and 16.2% of the conformations in these systems, respectively, a stark contrast to the 3.1% in wild-type thrombin (Figure 4(a)). This shift potentially elucidates the double mutant’s over 19,000-fold decrease in fibrinogen cleavage capability versus a 7-fold reduction in protein C activation[14, 5, 15, 16]. The catalytic triad exhibits two primary conformations: one in cluster 0 (Figure 4(b)), linked to fibrinogen cleavage, and another in cluster 1 (Figure 4(b)), associated with protein C activation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, the TM456-WE system predominantly exhibits conformations in cluster 0, signifying a closed 60s loop (Figure 3(b)), with none in clusters 1 or 2, unlike the 0.3% and 3.64% observed in the WT. This suggests that TM456 binding to the double mutant restricts the 60s loop’s ability to open, potentially explaining the minor 7-fold reduction in protein C activation with TM presence[14, 5, 15, 16]. The consistency of the HDBSCAN results for the 60s loop with our prior study[23] (93.7% and 89.99% conformations of WT and TM456-WT in cluster 0 previously, versus 93.06% and 88.81% currently) underscores the method’s reliability for this specific system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As has been shown for WT thrombin, the W215A/E217A thrombin mutant still requires TM to exhibit anticoagulative activity. 9,14,15 TM binding to ABE1 allosterically decreases the dynamics of the 170s CT , 180s CT , and 220s CT loops, which are 20−30 Å from ABE1. 21 In fact, these loops showed decreased H/D exchange in WT thrombin upon TM binding in the work presented here.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The W215A/E217A double mutant thrombin has been shown to act as a safe and efficacious anticoagulant intervention in vivo . The W215A/E217A thrombin is called an anticoagulant thrombin because it shifts the balance of these two thrombin activities away from procoagulative and toward anticoagulative substrates. , The loss of ability to cleave fibrinogen is much more significant than the loss of activity toward protein C, which still requires TM. , A crystallographic study suggested that the W215A/E217A mutation causes the primary substrate binding pocket of thrombin to collapse providing an explanation for its strongly decreased activity toward procoagulative substrates. However, it is not clear how TM renders this mutant with a closed substrate pocket capable of cleaving protein C. We hypothesized that the collapsed substrate binding pocket and/or the gain of function upon TM binding may indicate that the W215A/E217A thrombin is dynamic, and perhaps TM binding shifts the dynamic ensemble of thrombin states allowing protein C cleavage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%