1993
DOI: 10.1128/jb.175.10.2895-2906.1993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between the antisense and target RNAs involved in the regulation of IncB plasmid replication

Abstract: Physical analysis of RNA I, the small antisense RNA which regulates the replication of IncB miniplasmid pMU720, showed that it is a highly structured molecule containing an imperfectly paired stem closed by a 6-base hairpin loop. Mutational studies revealed that a 3-base sequence in the hairpin loop is critical to the interaction between RNA I and its complementary target in the RepA mRNA (RNA II). Furthermore, a 2-base interior loop in the upper stem was found to play an important role in facilitating effecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
56
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major consequence of duplex formation for repA expression is the sequestering of the proximal bases required * Corresponding author. for the formation of the pseudoknot, although this duplex formation also interferes with the access of ribosomes to the repB TIR (15). In support of its primary role in the inhibition of pseudoknot formation is the recent finding that the initial site of RNAI-RNAII interaction in pMU720 involves three of the four proximal bases essential for the formation of the pseudoknot (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The major consequence of duplex formation for repA expression is the sequestering of the proximal bases required * Corresponding author. for the formation of the pseudoknot, although this duplex formation also interferes with the access of ribosomes to the repB TIR (15). In support of its primary role in the inhibition of pseudoknot formation is the recent finding that the initial site of RNAI-RNAII interaction in pMU720 involves three of the four proximal bases essential for the formation of the pseudoknot (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…4). Bases in the interior loops of the upper stem have been shown to be as critical to the interaction between the antisense molecules and their targets as bases in the hairpin loops (43), so it is not surprising that despite the similarity in their hairpin loops, the IncL/M and IncK plasmids are compatible. Similarly, the differences in the hairpin loops and the interior loops of the upper stems of the respective antisense RNAs are sufficient to account for the observation that pMU604 is also compatible with both IncB and FII plasmids (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the proximal octanucleotide sequence is located in the loop of the stem-loop structure thought to be the target of RNAI, it is likely that formation of a complex between this structure and RNAI will sequester the proximal octanucleotide sequence and thus prevent formation of the pseudoknot. This is the case in plasmids pMU720 and ColIb-P9, where it has been shown that the bases in the loop of the target of RNAI that are involved in the initial kissing interaction with the antisense RNA are also the ones that are crucial for the formation of the pseudoknot (3,37,43). Thus, in broad terms, the mechanism by which RNAI controls the expression of repA of pMU604 appears to closely resemble that described for plasmids pMU720 and ColIb-P9 (3, 4, 12, 37, 54, 55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work has demonstrated the functional importance of interior loop structures within antisense RNA mechanisms that repress translation (Asano et al 1991;Siemering et al 1993;Hjalt and Wagner 1995a,b;Kolb et al 2001b). In these systems, antisense binding initiates through a kissing hairpin interaction with structures on the sense target mRNA, proceeding to a stable four-way junction complex that ultimately results in translation inhibition (Siemering et al 1994;Kolb et al 2001a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%