2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00705-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between secondary velocities, flow pulsation and vessel morphology in the common carotid artery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is attributed, in part, to the limited range-velocity product of pulsed Doppler velocimeters (aliasing), to the difficulty in correcting for angle in the presence of disturbed and non-axial flow (Tortoli et al, 2003), and to alterations in the velocity profile (Nichols and O'Rourke, 1998). However, as shown in Figure 4, the alias limit of 4.5 m/s was never exceeded in our experiments with mice, and the use of a Doppler angle close to zero would have minimized any potential errors due to disturbed flow and non-axial velocities (Li et al, 2003).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Baseline and Hyperemic Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is attributed, in part, to the limited range-velocity product of pulsed Doppler velocimeters (aliasing), to the difficulty in correcting for angle in the presence of disturbed and non-axial flow (Tortoli et al, 2003), and to alterations in the velocity profile (Nichols and O'Rourke, 1998). However, as shown in Figure 4, the alias limit of 4.5 m/s was never exceeded in our experiments with mice, and the use of a Doppler angle close to zero would have minimized any potential errors due to disturbed flow and non-axial velocities (Li et al, 2003).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Baseline and Hyperemic Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common choice of tag delivery function model is 'plug-flow' (i.e., constant and without dispersion). However, it is known that blood flow in the major arteries is likely to be poorly approximated by simple plug-flow, as it is both highly pulsatile and has a time-varying nonuniform cross-sectional flowprofile (5). Indeed, Wu et al (6) recently demonstrated experimentally that both flow dispersion and flow pulsatility have a significant effect on the ASL signal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The voxel should also be small enough that the assumption of a monotonically increasing or decreasing intravoxel velocity profile is not violated. These assumptions must be reevaluated when studying subjects with highly stenotic arteries (34)(35)(36)(37)(38). It is straightforward to determine if one of these conditions has been violated by analyzing the velocity distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%