2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between protein and energy supply on protein utilization in growing cattle: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be assumed that the main reason for the very high growth rate in the present study was the effect of high silage digestibility leading to high energy intake and optimal conditions for microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. According to Schroeder and Titgemeyer (2008), energy supply affects the efficiency of protein utilization. The improved LWG on early-cut silage or on silage of high digestibility has earlier been confirmed in several studies (e.g.…”
Section: Effects Of Silage Digestibility On Animal Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be assumed that the main reason for the very high growth rate in the present study was the effect of high silage digestibility leading to high energy intake and optimal conditions for microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. According to Schroeder and Titgemeyer (2008), energy supply affects the efficiency of protein utilization. The improved LWG on early-cut silage or on silage of high digestibility has earlier been confirmed in several studies (e.g.…”
Section: Effects Of Silage Digestibility On Animal Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lysine and methionine have frequently been identified as the first and second limiting amino acids for growing cattle (Klemesrud et al, 2000a and2000b). The requirements for these limiting amino acids have been estimated from studies in which the amino acids were infused postruminally in a protected form to allow escape from the ruminal microbial deamination but available for digestion and absorption in the small intestine (Schroeder and Titgemeyer, 2008) being the recommended ratio between them around 3.0 (INRA, 2007). However, growth response to supplementation of diets with escape proteins has been inconsistent (Klemesrud et al, 2000a and2000b;Schroeder and Titgemeyer, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirements for these limiting amino acids have been estimated from studies in which the amino acids were infused postruminally in a protected form to allow escape from the ruminal microbial deamination but available for digestion and absorption in the small intestine (Schroeder and Titgemeyer, 2008) being the recommended ratio between them around 3.0 (INRA, 2007). However, growth response to supplementation of diets with escape proteins has been inconsistent (Klemesrud et al, 2000a and2000b;Schroeder and Titgemeyer, 2008). Tissue composition (total muscle, total fat and bone percentages) did not significantly differ between castration ages (Table 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have demonstrated that greater flow of post-ruminal AA increases the small intestinal OM and starch digestibility (Richards et al, 2002) and increases portal glucose appearance (Taniguchi et al, 1995), and consequently improve AA absorption from the basal diet probably by sparing gut-tissue AA from breakdown. In addition, it was reported that the additional energy supplied by excess AA can improve the absorption of other limiting AA (Schroeder and Titgemeyer, 2008). In our study, the AAI was rich in BCAA, His, Met and Arg compared with microbial protein (Storm and Orskov, 1983) and provided 1.63 MJ ME/ day (18% of ME requirements for maintenance).…”
Section: N Balancementioning
confidence: 64%