2008
DOI: 10.1075/is.9.2.05agr
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between human and robot

Abstract: This paper presents a human-robot interaction framework where a robot can infer implicit affective cues of a human and respond to them appropriately. Affective cues are inferred by the robot in real-time from physiological signals. A robot-based basketball game is designed where a robotic "coach" monitors the human participant's anxiety to dynamically reconfigure game parameters to allow skill improvement while maintaining desired anxiety levels. The results of the above-mentioned anxiety-based sessions are co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In developing the STA, we aim to further the understanding of humanrobot symbiotic interaction; symbiosis in this instance is defined as the capacity of the robot, and the person, to mutually influence each other in ways beneficial to the interaction and interaction task outcomes. Examples of symbiosis may include a robot reconfiguring task requirements in response to users' emotions (e.g., simplifying tasks to reduce user anxiety, Agrawal, Liu, & Sarkar, 2008) and users modifying behaviours in collaborative HRI tasks to better signal their intended actions (e.g., Charisi, et al, 2015). As such, symbiosis, in a social context, requires that the robot can interpret, and be responsive to, the behaviour and state of the person, and adapt its own actions appropriately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing the STA, we aim to further the understanding of humanrobot symbiotic interaction; symbiosis in this instance is defined as the capacity of the robot, and the person, to mutually influence each other in ways beneficial to the interaction and interaction task outcomes. Examples of symbiosis may include a robot reconfiguring task requirements in response to users' emotions (e.g., simplifying tasks to reduce user anxiety, Agrawal, Liu, & Sarkar, 2008) and users modifying behaviours in collaborative HRI tasks to better signal their intended actions (e.g., Charisi, et al, 2015). As such, symbiosis, in a social context, requires that the robot can interpret, and be responsive to, the behaviour and state of the person, and adapt its own actions appropriately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%