2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between HIV and intravenous heroin abuse?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effects include increases in tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) production (Chao et al, 1994) and upregulation of CCR5 and CXCR4 [see (Rogers and Peterson, 2003)], heterologous cross-sensitization of CCR5 (McCarthy et al, 2001;Rogers and Peterson, 2003), and alterations in HIV propagation in lymphocytes and monocytes/macrophages [reviewed in (McCarthy et al, 2001;Rogers and Peterson, 2003)]. Although the prevalence of HIV infection among opiate abusers is substantial, and opiates may accelerate the frequency and severity of HIV encephalitis (HIVE) (Bell et al, 1998;Nath et al, 2000;Nath et al, 2002), other evidence suggest that opiates can allay systemic HIV infection (Donahoe and Vlahov, 1998;Everall, 2004;Donahoe, 2004). The deleterious effects may be particularly evident in the CNS (Donahoe, 2004) and whether opiates are good, bad or act indifferently likely varies among cell types and depends on the parameter measured (Khurdayan et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects include increases in tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) production (Chao et al, 1994) and upregulation of CCR5 and CXCR4 [see (Rogers and Peterson, 2003)], heterologous cross-sensitization of CCR5 (McCarthy et al, 2001;Rogers and Peterson, 2003), and alterations in HIV propagation in lymphocytes and monocytes/macrophages [reviewed in (McCarthy et al, 2001;Rogers and Peterson, 2003)]. Although the prevalence of HIV infection among opiate abusers is substantial, and opiates may accelerate the frequency and severity of HIV encephalitis (HIVE) (Bell et al, 1998;Nath et al, 2000;Nath et al, 2002), other evidence suggest that opiates can allay systemic HIV infection (Donahoe and Vlahov, 1998;Everall, 2004;Donahoe, 2004). The deleterious effects may be particularly evident in the CNS (Donahoe, 2004) and whether opiates are good, bad or act indifferently likely varies among cell types and depends on the parameter measured (Khurdayan et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of various epidemiological studies vary with some showing that opiates may have a protective role (Spijkerman et al, 1995; Spijkerman et al, 1996a), others showing a deleterious role (Bouwman et al, 1998; Hutchinson et al, 1997; Krol et al, 1999), and still others finding no effect (Pezzotti et al, 1999; Prins and Veugelers, 1997; Thorpe et al, 2004) on HIV-related pathology and/or mortality rates. Unfortunately, human studies are often confounded by differences in drug abuse pattern and duration, polydrug use, as well as widespread implementation of antiviral therapies (Everall, 2004; Kapadia et al, 2005). However, a recent study by Thorpe et al (2004), based on a large population of HIV-infected women who were either “hard-drug” users or not, is significant in that it was possible to achieve better control of multiple variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to experimental findings, epidemiological studies are beginning to establish links between opiate drug use and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) progression Donahoe and Vlahov, 1998), although the extent to which opiates per se contribute to AIDS progression remains controversial (Ansari, 2004;Donahoe, 2004;Everall, 2004). It is important to consider, however, that the effects of opiates on systemic immune function and HIV progression may not be readily extrapolated to their effects in the CNS, which appear to be preferentially vulnerable to opiate drug-HIV interactions Nath et al, 2002;Donahoe, 2004;El-Hage et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%