2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between head fire and backfire in grasslands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(64 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect highlights the occurrence of the flame-merging phenomenon where the heat released from the merged flame is higher than the heat released from the individual flames combined. A similar observation was made by Morvan et al (2013) who studied fire propagation through grasslands, where a spike in the heat release rate was reported at the time of flame merging between a head and a back fire. Fig.…”
Section: Zero Separation Distancesupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect highlights the occurrence of the flame-merging phenomenon where the heat released from the merged flame is higher than the heat released from the individual flames combined. A similar observation was made by Morvan et al (2013) who studied fire propagation through grasslands, where a spike in the heat release rate was reported at the time of flame merging between a head and a back fire. Fig.…”
Section: Zero Separation Distancesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…They concluded that this negative pressure is the cause of larger horizontal indrafts of ambient air, which in turn are the reason for the increase in the overall flame height. Morvan et al (2011Morvan et al ( , 2013 studied the interactions between two fire fronts (a head fire and a back fire) that propagate through a fuel bed, using a physics-based model. The motivation behind this research was from a firefighting standpoint, where a back fire is used to eliminate the fuel ahead of the main propagating fire front.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FireStar3D/WFDS on one hand and FIRETEC on the other, can explain the difference in efficiency between these 3D codes and in their ability to simulate some particular configurations, such as backfire situations [52,53].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach initially proposed by Grishin [7] has been extended with success to simulate in 2D and 3D the behaviour of surface and crown fires in numerous situations [8,9,10]. The solid phases representing the various solid fuel elements (foliage, twigs, trunk, etc.)…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%