2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between fish gelatin and tremella polysaccharides from aqueous solutions to complex coacervates: Structure and rheological properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SPI, TA, HWP are the stretching vibration of -OH at 3500–3200 cm −1 ; the amide I band (stretching vibration of C=O) and amide II band (bending vibration of -NH) exist at 1700–1600 cm −1 and 1300–1200 cm −1 , and the absorption peak at 520 cm −1 is the -SH stretching vibration peak [ 30 ]. The FTIR profiles of the complex and tremella polysaccharide and corresponding proteins showed no appearance or disappearance of specific absorption peaks, which was consistent with the results of previous studies [ 31 ]. Compared with the absorption peaks of polysaccharide and protein at 3200–3300 cm −1 , the absorption intensity of the complex increased and shifted towards the direction of low wave number, indicating that hydrogen bond interaction was enhanced and intermolecular interaction was increased, and macroscopically, the grafting degree and polymerization degree of the complex increased.…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SPI, TA, HWP are the stretching vibration of -OH at 3500–3200 cm −1 ; the amide I band (stretching vibration of C=O) and amide II band (bending vibration of -NH) exist at 1700–1600 cm −1 and 1300–1200 cm −1 , and the absorption peak at 520 cm −1 is the -SH stretching vibration peak [ 30 ]. The FTIR profiles of the complex and tremella polysaccharide and corresponding proteins showed no appearance or disappearance of specific absorption peaks, which was consistent with the results of previous studies [ 31 ]. Compared with the absorption peaks of polysaccharide and protein at 3200–3300 cm −1 , the absorption intensity of the complex increased and shifted towards the direction of low wave number, indicating that hydrogen bond interaction was enhanced and intermolecular interaction was increased, and macroscopically, the grafting degree and polymerization degree of the complex increased.…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It can be seen from Figure 7 that the complex of protein and polysaccharide presents a three-dimensional network structure with different numbers of holes that penetrate and cross-link each other. The complex of tremella polysaccharide and soybean protein had the least voids and the most compact and uniform structure, indicating that the interaction was the strongest [31], which was consistent with the above experimental results. Studies have shown that the interaction between polysaccharides and proteins is mainly based on hydrogen bonds, which is mainly due to the strong hydrophilicity of tremella polysaccharides, while the protein and polysaccharide molecular chains contain a large number of hydroxyl, amino, carbonyl, and other groups, which are prone to hydrogen bond interactions.…”
Section: Microstructure Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This might be due to the strong electrostatic interaction between oppositely charged PPI (NH 3 + ) and LBG (COO À ) contributing to higher viscosity. 33 Similar results were reported for other coacervates like whey protein isolate-flax seed gum 34 ; and rice bran protein-flax seed gum. 35 The amplitude/strain sweep was performed to select linear viscoelastic region (LVER) and therefore helpful to conduct further experiments like frequency sweep test.…”
Section: Viscoelastic Properties Of the Coacervatessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Similar results were observed for PPI-sugar beet pectin 20 and fish gelatin-tremella coacervates. 33 Among all, at pH 4.5 both G 0 and G 00 showed higher values, indicating formation of stronger coacervate structure due to higher electrostatic interaction between PPI-LBG. Additionally, lower G 0 and G 00 values were obtained at pH 6 indicating the presence of less positive charges of PPI, leading to electrostatic repulsion.…”
Section: Viscoelastic Properties Of the Coacervatesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…24 Previous reports have revealed that at higher total biological concentrations, an increased presence of counter ions in the solution can effectively shield the charged sites on the surface of biological macromolecules. 25,26 The 0.1% total biopolymer concentration was therefore selected for further investigations into the factors influencing the turbidity of GE-CMS coacervates.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Effect Of Ph On The ζ-Potential Of Ge...mentioning
confidence: 99%