2015
DOI: 10.1159/000431151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between Common Genetic Variants and Total Fat Intake on Low-Density Lipoprotein Peak Particle Diameter: A Genome-Wide Association Study

Abstract: Background/Aim: Total fat intake has an important impact on the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) peak particle diameter (LDL-PPD) and may interact with nutrient-sensitive single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The objective wasto examine whether there is suggestive evidence of SNP × dietary fat intake interaction effects influencing the LDL-PPD in the Quebec Family Study (QFS) in order to generate hypotheses to be tested in larger studies. Methods: SNPs from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using Illumina … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most frequently found, unsurprisingly, were genes associated by GWAS to diabetes or diabetes-related cardio-metabolic traits (cluster 3: MYO3B , cluster 4: DAPK1 , cluster 5: LPIN2 , cluster 7: SAMD4A and FHIT , cluster 8: ERG and PLCB1 , cluster 12: MYT1L , cluster 15: UBE2WP1 , cluster 16: ADARB2, CDKAL1, and CLIP1 , cluster 17: C8orf37-AS1 , cluster 21: FHOD3 and MCF2L, cluster 24: MTCL1 , cluster 26: NTM , cluster 31: PCDH15 , CDH4 , and DCTD , cluster 31: KLF12 , cluster 39: FHOD3 , cluster 45: IGF1R , BCAS3, and TENM4 , cluster 46: NRXN3 ). Cluster eight is characterized by cardiovascular complications, and three of the top ranking genes for this cluster have been associated with LDL peak particle diameter ( THBS4 ; Rudkowska et al, 2015), abdominal aortic aneurysm ( ERG ; Jones et al, 2017), pulse pressure ( ERG ; Warren et al, 2017), and diastolic blood pressure ( PLCB1 ; Warren et al, 2017). Cluster 21 is enriched for the ICD-10 diagnosis foot ulcer (L97), and MCF2L , one of the top ranking genes for cluster, has been associated with both end-stage coagulation (Williams et al, 2013) and prothrombin time (Tang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most frequently found, unsurprisingly, were genes associated by GWAS to diabetes or diabetes-related cardio-metabolic traits (cluster 3: MYO3B , cluster 4: DAPK1 , cluster 5: LPIN2 , cluster 7: SAMD4A and FHIT , cluster 8: ERG and PLCB1 , cluster 12: MYT1L , cluster 15: UBE2WP1 , cluster 16: ADARB2, CDKAL1, and CLIP1 , cluster 17: C8orf37-AS1 , cluster 21: FHOD3 and MCF2L, cluster 24: MTCL1 , cluster 26: NTM , cluster 31: PCDH15 , CDH4 , and DCTD , cluster 31: KLF12 , cluster 39: FHOD3 , cluster 45: IGF1R , BCAS3, and TENM4 , cluster 46: NRXN3 ). Cluster eight is characterized by cardiovascular complications, and three of the top ranking genes for this cluster have been associated with LDL peak particle diameter ( THBS4 ; Rudkowska et al, 2015), abdominal aortic aneurysm ( ERG ; Jones et al, 2017), pulse pressure ( ERG ; Warren et al, 2017), and diastolic blood pressure ( PLCB1 ; Warren et al, 2017). Cluster 21 is enriched for the ICD-10 diagnosis foot ulcer (L97), and MCF2L , one of the top ranking genes for cluster, has been associated with both end-stage coagulation (Williams et al, 2013) and prothrombin time (Tang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QFS cohort involves participants from 222 French-Canadian families from Quebec City, making up a largely homogeneous ancestry population. Family relatedness was handled by using generalized linear mixed models, a statistical method successfully applied in the past when testing genetic associations in samples with family or cryptic relatedness among individuals (Choquette et al, 2012; Plourde et al, 2013; Rudkowska et al, 2015; Chen et al, 2016). A recent study comparing distributions of polygenic scores of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease within populations with different ancestries has shown that the risk level estimated for one population can considerably differ from the level in another (Reisberg et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the completion of the mapping of the Human Genome, a cumulative number of association studies have been performed in order to identify the genetic factors that may explain the inter-individual variability of the metabolic response to specific diets. In this sense, while numerous genes and polymorphisms have been already identified as relevant factors in this heterogeneous response to nutrient intake [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ], clinical evidence supporting these statistical relationships is currently too weak to establish a comprehensive framework for personalized nutritional interventions in most cases [ 8 ]. Thus, although most of findings on this topic are still relatively far from giving their fully expected potential in terms of translation and application of this knowledge to precision nutrition [ 9 ], some of them have been successfully developed in both the public and the private sectors.…”
Section: Precision Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%