1970
DOI: 10.1021/ja00713a041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between acridine dyes and deoxyribonucleic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
61
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 The interaction of methylene blue with DNA has been studied with various methods. [22][23][24][25][26] Most studies have indicated that at low ionic strength buffer and low concentration of DNA, the major binding mode of MB with DNA is through intercalation. 24,27 Moreover, MB has a low toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 The interaction of methylene blue with DNA has been studied with various methods. [22][23][24][25][26] Most studies have indicated that at low ionic strength buffer and low concentration of DNA, the major binding mode of MB with DNA is through intercalation. 24,27 Moreover, MB has a low toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The interaction of methylene blue with DNA has been studied with various methods. [26][27][28][29][30] Most studies indicated that (at low ionic strength buffer and low concentration of DNA) the major binding mode of MB with DNA was through intercalation. [28][29][30][31] Moreover, MB has a low toxicity; data from material Safety Data Sheet of Vanderbilt Environmental Health & Safety (VEHS) show that MB is slightly hazardous in case of skin contact, eye contact, ingestion, and inhalation but there is no evidence which shows that MB is a carcinogenic compound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, preliminary measurements indicate that the dissociation constant ratio for the two types of dye-polymer binding monitored by the present technique is about 100, which is about the binding constant ratio observed for proflavin binding to DNA (15). This fact, together with the different ionic strength dependencies for the two types of dye-polymer binding observed in our experiments ( Table 1), argues that the dye-binding heterogeneity disclosed by the spin-orbital probe technique corresponds to the two-state dye-polymer binding observed by other workers in several dye-polymer systems, as opposed to binding to the two distinct intercalation sites in alternating copolymers like poly(dA-BrdU).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%