2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38844-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction Based Content Recommendation in Online Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) Interaction frequency Frequency of interaction between two users indicate the strength of the relationship between user and friends [31]. This is because user with similar interests or preferences will actively interact and share information [32]. The more user interacts with their friends, the more likely they have the same preferences as a discussion topic [33].…”
Section: Friendship Strength Based On User's Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Interaction frequency Frequency of interaction between two users indicate the strength of the relationship between user and friends [31]. This is because user with similar interests or preferences will actively interact and share information [32]. The more user interacts with their friends, the more likely they have the same preferences as a discussion topic [33].…”
Section: Friendship Strength Based On User's Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matthews et al [31] and Muller et al [35] examined online communities in the intranet and how community owners can enhance the value of their communities. Online communities can be implicit, identified by the system (e.g., [27,36]), or explicit through membership (e.g., [31]). Our work examines explicitly defined online communities in a large enterprise.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our current recommenders are built using our original trust model, which embodies explicit and implicit interactions among users (as it is based on users' behavior in the network). We have already conducted a series of evaluation experiments with these recommenders, comparing them to recommenders that exploit only explicit friendships among users (i.e., recommenders that exploit the social graph, considering direct friendships and "friends of a friend"-the FOAF concept) (Nepal et al 2013b;Nepal et al 2013c). These experiments showed that capturing implicit links (via the social trust concept) leads to performance improvements.…”
Section: Experiments With the Trust Propagation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To encourage interactions, we turn to recommendations, in particular people and content recommendations, based on members’ social trust behavior , or their behavior (both active and passive) towards each other in the network (Nepal et al ; Nepal et al ). Unlike electronic commerce applications, where incentives are provided in tangible ways (e.g., monetary and material forms), the incentives in this model is to build a standing in the community through trusting and trusted interactions in the community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%