R Ra ac ci ia al l AAm mb bi ig gu ui it ty y A Am mo on ng g t th he e B Br ra az zi il li ia an n P Po op pu ul la at ti io on n Edward E. Telles
CCPR-012-01
May 2001California Center for Population Research On-Line Working Paper Series This is a revised version of a paper presented at a Brown University Sociology Department colloquium in September, 1998. National Science Foundation Grant SBR-9710366 supported the research.
2
RACIAL AMBIGUITY AMONG THE BRAZILIAN POPULATIONABSTRACT I investigate the extent of ambiguity in racial classification using a national representative survey of Brazilian urban areas. Ambiguity is operationalized as the lack of consistency between racial classification by interviewers (categorization) and respondents (identification) using the categories, white, brown, and black. Racial classifications are consistent in 79 percent of the study sample. However, persons at the light end of the color continuum tend to be consistently classified while ambiguity is especially great for those at the darker end. Using statistical estimation techniques, the findings also reveal that consistency varies from 20 to 100 percent depending on one's education, age, and sex and the racial composition of local urban areas. For example, only 20 percent of high educated females that self-classified as black were classified as black by interviewers while classification as white was nearly always consistent in predominately white urban areas.Also, the direction of the inconsistencies to lighter or darker categories depends on these variables and whether the reference is intervie wer or respondent classification. For example, interviewers "whitened" the classification of higher educated persons who identified themselves as brown, especially when such persons resided in mostly nonwhite cities. Finally, I discuss the role of the Brazilian state in constructing race, and understandings of race and racial groups and comparative studies of race relations.3
PATTERNS AND DIRECTIONS OF AMBIGUITY IN BRAZILIAN RACIAL CLASSIFICATIONAlthough racial differences in life chances depend largely on racial classification and discrimination by others, sociological studies that examine these phenomena often rely on censuses or surveys in which race data is based on self-classification, using predetermined categories. In Brazil, this is problematic because of the ambiguity known to exist in its racial classifications. The Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) instructs interviewers to code race in the decennial Census of Brazil according to the respondent's declaration. However, interviewers sometimes respond themselves either because they assume they know the correct response category, they feel uncomfortable in asking about race, or they rush interviews and provide cursory responses to questions they feel are not critical (Rosemberg et al 1993, Pinto 1996. An earlier study showed that racial classification between interviewer and respondent is often inconsistent and racial inequality is high regardless of who ma...