Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2494266.2494288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interacting with digital cultural heritage collections via annotations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In connection with the ontology-based annotation research, projects and tools supporting collaborative semantic annotation are worth mentioning. For example, the Micropasts (crowdsourced.micropasts.org) (Bonacchi et al, 2019) and CULTURA (www.cultura-strep.eu) (Agosti et al, 2013) projects aimed at enabling users to participate in the annotation of historical documents, while the MultimediaN E-Culture project (multimedian.project.cwi.nl) (Schreiber et al, 2008) developed a web-based system for the semantic annotation of Cultural Heritage objects. The SAGE framework (Foley et al, 2017) is particularly interesting beecause, besides semantic annotation, introduces automatic techniques to support users in the annotation activity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In connection with the ontology-based annotation research, projects and tools supporting collaborative semantic annotation are worth mentioning. For example, the Micropasts (crowdsourced.micropasts.org) (Bonacchi et al, 2019) and CULTURA (www.cultura-strep.eu) (Agosti et al, 2013) projects aimed at enabling users to participate in the annotation of historical documents, while the MultimediaN E-Culture project (multimedian.project.cwi.nl) (Schreiber et al, 2008) developed a web-based system for the semantic annotation of Cultural Heritage objects. The SAGE framework (Foley et al, 2017) is particularly interesting beecause, besides semantic annotation, introduces automatic techniques to support users in the annotation activity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These collections were selected so as to have two different media formats on which they could test some of the key technologies. The former targeted text and the latter targeted images [26].…”
Section: Dilasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the objectives of CULTURA was to bridge the gap between the expert users, who were knowledgable on the relevant search parameters to access the digital content and the other users who had to be guided through good user interface and intuitive design in order to retrieve the content [26,49,50].…”
Section: Dilasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason, user satisfaction is an essential underlying factor that determines the quality of the user experience when using web-based historical world maps as it fulfils the primary power, cartographic carelessness, message, interests, and persuasive techniques of the maps (Press & Cooper, 2017). Consequently, positive user satisfaction have a higher quality of the user experience when using the web-based historical world maps as it can be used as a positive tool to persuade the audience to choose between maps (Agosti, 31 Conlan, Ferro, Hampson, & Munnelly, 2013Hampson, & Munnelly, 2013, e.g., if the primary user satisfaction is dependent on the persuasive techniques as an added feature that is included in the web-based historical maps system (Press & Cooper, 2017). This also includes features in the web-based historical maps help improve the user satisfaction experience, e.g., the selection of information, symbolism, shape, and the colours of the maps must be user satisfying to positively influence the quality of the when using web-based historical world maps.…”
Section: User Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%