1999
DOI: 10.11610/isij.0211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interacting Multiple Model Algorithms for Manoeuvring Ship Tracking Based On New Ship Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In each modeled state the force has a different effect, since the ship is likely to actuate a given motion (still anchored, navigation, approaching, etc.). In [84] the state vector of the considered model is extended to include the ship state, heading, rate of turn, drift angle and velocity; etc. Among the alternatives we can mention fixed/variable structure augmented IMM Algorithm for Ship Tracking, and hybrid algorithms doing simultaneous parameter and state estimation.…”
Section: Context In Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each modeled state the force has a different effect, since the ship is likely to actuate a given motion (still anchored, navigation, approaching, etc.). In [84] the state vector of the considered model is extended to include the ship state, heading, rate of turn, drift angle and velocity; etc. Among the alternatives we can mention fixed/variable structure augmented IMM Algorithm for Ship Tracking, and hybrid algorithms doing simultaneous parameter and state estimation.…”
Section: Context In Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, may allow the right interpretation of sensor data and the adaptation/optimization in a great deal of fusion system performance. Examples of sources of knowledge, additional to sensor data, are: constraints in motion depending on local topography [35,36], trafficability constraints [37], expected maneuvers motion patterns depending on situation [38], a priori known relationships between entities and environment [39,40], etc. …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use either term if they coincide or one does not exist (strictly speaking, a point target without a shape has no heading). Turn rate is usually defined as the heading change rate.¯= 0 is given by [88,89,66] x k+1 = x k + Tv k sin Á k (94) y k+1 = y k + Tv k cos Á k (95) Á k+1 = Á k + Tv k [ k + 1 2 ( k 0 )Tv k ¿e Tv k ¿ ] (96) k+1 = k e Tv k ¿ + 0 (1 e Tv k ¿ ) (97) v k = Kv 0 = v 0 (1 + 1:9 2 k L 2 ) 1 (98) where ¿ = ( p=2 + p 2 =4 q)=L and 0 = =v 0 . The time constant ¿ was set to zero in [88,90], resulting in a constant turn rate (i.e., k+1 = k ), to eliminate the dependence of the model on the ship-specific hydrodynamic constants.…”
Section: E Ship Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unknown k was assumed to take on one of the three possible values 0, c , c with a preset constant c , representing rectilinear, left-turn, and right-turn motions, respectively, and the tracker presented therein was based on a multiple-model algorithm using these three models for k . The above nonlinear model has been proposed for ship tracking [88,89,66]. Other ship dynamic models are available (see, e.g., [91,33,92]), some of which appear simpler and more popular.…”
Section: E Ship Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%