2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interacting effects of uncertainties and institutional forces on information sharing in marketing channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional marketing mostly highlights the flow of information from downstream customers to buying firms and to their supplying firms (Jia et al , 2014). Supplying firms have access to the information about downstream customers mostly through their buying firms (Kumar et al , 2016; Fang, 2008).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional marketing mostly highlights the flow of information from downstream customers to buying firms and to their supplying firms (Jia et al , 2014). Supplying firms have access to the information about downstream customers mostly through their buying firms (Kumar et al , 2016; Fang, 2008).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compatibility in inter-organizations' goals encourages sharing of information related to demand, sales and strategy. This exchange of information permits transactions and operations (Heide and John, 1992;Jia et al, 2014). Information shared aid channel members respond to market uncertainty by better production planning and demand forecasting (Frazier et al, 2009).…”
Section: A Mediation Model For Goal Compatibility and Co-creation Of Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manufacturer-distributor relationships include some sort of information exchange through effective communication (Jia et al, 2014). For example, distributors have strategic information that manufacturers often find difficult to obtain (Pimentel and Oliveira, 2010) about different aspects: customers (e.g.…”
Section: Effect Of Relationship-specific Investments On Relational Governancementioning
confidence: 99%