2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumble bees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
157
1
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
11
157
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Landscape context (composition and heterogeneity of land use types) in agricultural systems has been shown to have an important influence on species richness and abundance for a range of taxa (bumble bees [Rundlo¨f et al 2008]; all bee species [Holzschuh et al 2007, Williams et al 2010; hoverflies [Kleijn and van Langevelde 2006]; arable plants [Roschewitz et al 2005]). Consistent with these studies, we found that differences in species number between sown forage patches and existing conventionally managed field edges (control patches) increased with the proportion of arable land in the landscape.…”
Section: Effects Of Landscape Context and Foraging Habitat Qualitysupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Landscape context (composition and heterogeneity of land use types) in agricultural systems has been shown to have an important influence on species richness and abundance for a range of taxa (bumble bees [Rundlo¨f et al 2008]; all bee species [Holzschuh et al 2007, Williams et al 2010; hoverflies [Kleijn and van Langevelde 2006]; arable plants [Roschewitz et al 2005]). Consistent with these studies, we found that differences in species number between sown forage patches and existing conventionally managed field edges (control patches) increased with the proportion of arable land in the landscape.…”
Section: Effects Of Landscape Context and Foraging Habitat Qualitysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is also clear that farming systems can interact with landscape context to determine local bee diversity, such that, for example, organic farming has a stronger positive effect on bee diversity in homogeneous landscapes (Holzschuh et al 2007, Rundlo¨f et al 2008. However, while it has been proposed that conservation measures promoting the sowing of flower mixtures should focus on more intensively farmed (though not highly simplified) landscapes , Isaacs et al 2009, there is no experimental evidence for this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bees (Box 4), relationships between habitat loss and species traits have been intensively studied (Krauss et al, 2009;Moretti et al, 2009;SteffanDewenter et al, 2006), with diet width and sociality being especially important (Aizen and Feinsinger, 1994a,b;Klein et al, 2003;Ö ckinger and Smith, 2007;Rundlöf et al, 2008;. Social bees are expected to outperform solitary taxa in harvesting resources because of their higher foraging and food-provision capacity (e.g.…”
Section: Animal Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods often involve a combination of different types of crop-annual, perennial and woody species-such as agroforestry and agro-silvicultural systems with a combination of crops and fruit-trees, such as alley cropping or home gardens [29]. Biological diversity is promoted and enhanced by the crop diversity and by production methods that will increase biodiversity of different organism groups, e.g., pollinators [30]. Further, such production systems promote a diverse landscape structure, which facilitates the maintenance and production of a number of other ecosystem services, not least recreation by attracting visitors (cf.…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%