Inter-Religious Dialogue Models in Malaysia

Abstract

Over the years, many organizations have involved in the implementation of inter-religious dialogue in Malaysia. However, there are stillthose who doubt the role and purpose of interreligious dialogue. This might be due to lack of information and understanding regardingthe methodology of dialogue and also about different types that it may take. The present study is aimed at exploring a few models ofinter-religious dialogue that have been practised by some organizations that actively involved in dialogue. The study focuses on a review of selected organizational or institutional dialoguemodels such as Center for Civilizational Dialogue (CCD), Students Representative Council of Malaysia Science University (HealthCampus) and Inter-faith Spiritual Fellowship (INSaF). This study provides information concerning the various designs of inter-religiousdialogue model in Malaysia and proposes that different designs of inter-religious dialogue rely on its different types and goals. It is found that, the commonly practiced type of dialogue in Malaysia is educational type which focuses on exploring inter-religious commonalities as well as differences which consequently willincrease understanding and foster meaningful engagement between people of different ethnic and religious background in Malaysia. Thistype of dialogue is distinguished from conflict resolution types of dialogue which aims at identifying issues and generating action plansto conflicts or disputes

“My Soul is Empty...”: The Intensive Care Patients’ and Their Family Members’ Experience of Spiritual Care

“…A review that discussed interfaith spiritual care indicated that this is a condition in which the patients and spiritual care providers have different spiritual or religious worldviews (20). As stated by comparative religion experts, positive inter-religious dialogue should be actively practised because it can foster meaningful engagement between different people from different ethnic and religious backgrounds (21).…”

Need Of Interfaith Dialogue For Peace Building In Pakistan: An Approach Of Madrasa Teachers In South Punjab

“…Dialogue is a way forward to solve numerous long lived problems and misconstructions. Dialogue is never evangelism and debates rather an attempt to comprehend and appreciate those who are dogmatically different from you (Yusof & Ab Majid, 2012).…”

“…This type of dialogue can harvest the consequences of prevailing worldwide peace, resolution of conflicts and can ensure the promotion of education, justice and economic security for all (Jami, 2012). As dialogue is a scholarly discourse so it has to be only by those who enjoy proficiency in religious matters (Yusof & Ab Majid, 2012). Villumstad (2002) accentuated that principle of fair representation is extremely essential to be esteemed.…”

Sensitive Issues, Complex Categories, and Sharing Festivals: Malay Muslim Students’ Perspectives on Interfaith Engagement in Malaysia

“…Any suspicions about the motives of other participants may reduce its effectiveness (Ariarajah, ). In Malaysia, attempts at interfaith dialogue have primarily taken place in university settings for educational purposes rather than for conflict resolution (Wan Yusof & Ab Majid, ), yet uncertainty and controversy remain about how interfaith dialogue might be established within the Malaysian context (for example, due to concerns about proselytization) (Lim, ).…”