2014
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-reader agreement in HRCT detection of pleural plaques and asbestosis in participants with previous occupational exposure to asbestos

Abstract: Interpretation of benign asbestos-related thoracic abnormalities requires standardisation of the reading and trained readers, particularly for participants asking for compensation, and with a view to the longitudinal survey of asbestos-exposed workers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, significantly greater quantities of PPs were observable in exposed subjects than in the control groups 25 (66%) vs. 2 (5%). PPs can arise even after relatively low exposure to asbestiform fibers and are the most common non-malignant effects (31)(32)(33)35,(54)(55)(56)(57).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, significantly greater quantities of PPs were observable in exposed subjects than in the control groups 25 (66%) vs. 2 (5%). PPs can arise even after relatively low exposure to asbestiform fibers and are the most common non-malignant effects (31)(32)(33)35,(54)(55)(56)(57).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asbestosis, however, cannot be distinguished by HRCT from a possible or definite UIP pattern [ 26 ]. The first round of screening of this cohort has been reported [ 1 ] and conversely to the agreement between trained expert readers for the detection of pleural plaques that was good to excellent, the agreement between trained expert readers for the detection of interstitial abnormalities has been reported to be fair to good [ 27 ]. In an attempt to circumvent the subjects with possible mild or moderate asbestosis, we separated those subjects from those with an interstitial pattern inconsistent with UIP, using the criteria defined by ATS/ERS consensus paper [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ongoing studies continue to support the increased sensitivity and specificity of HRCT over chest radiography for changes related to occupational lung disease [26,43,[56][57][58], although the level of radiologist expertise can affect interpretation [59]. HRCT proves central in the imaging of classic and emerging pneumoconioses [6,34,[60][61][62][63][64], as well as differentiating occupational lung disease from other ILDs [65,66].…”
Section: Discussion Of Procedures By Variantmentioning
confidence: 98%